Demographics details for Joliet, IL vs Sugar grove, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Joliet, IL vs Sugar grove, NC.

Data Joliet Sugar grove
Population 150,033 100
Median Age 34.3 years 38.0 years
Median Income $84,971 $50,000
Married Families 35.0% 60.0%
Poverty Level 12% 10%
Unemployment Rate 7.1 4.5

Population Comparison: Joliet vs Sugar grove

  • In Joliet, the population is higher at 150,033, compared to 100 in Sugar grove.
  • The median age in Sugar grove is higher at 38.0 years, compared to 34.3 years in Joliet.
  • Joliet has a higher median income of $84,971 compared to $50,000 in Sugar grove.
  • In Sugar grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 35.0% in Joliet.
  • Joliet has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Sugar grove.
  • The unemployment rate in Joliet is higher at 7.1%, compared to 4.5% in Sugar grove.

Demographics

Demographics Joliet vs Sugar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Joliet Sugar grove
Black 17 Data is updating
White 36 100
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 34 Data is updating
Two or More Races 10 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Joliet vs Sugar grove

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Joliet at 17% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sugar grove at 100% compared to 36% in Joliet.
  • The Asian population is larger in Joliet at 2% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Joliet at 34% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Joliet at 10% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Joliet at 1% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Joliet Sugar grove
Mental Health Not Good 15.7% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 11.7% Data is updating%
Depression 19.1% Data is updating%
Smoking 16.9% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.2% Data is updating%
Obesity 37.4% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 9.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Joliet vs Sugar grove

  • More residents in Joliet report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Joliet at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Joliet at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Joliet at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Joliet at 37.4% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Joliet at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Joliet Sugar grove
No Schooling 1.5% (2,247) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 14.9% (22,362) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 17.5% (26,199) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.6% (23,354) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Joliet vs Sugar grove

  • A higher percentage of residents in Joliet have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Joliet hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • More residents in Joliet have less than a high school education at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Joliet hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.