Demographics details for Joliet, IL vs Cochran, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Joliet, IL vs Cochran, GA.
Data | Joliet | Cochran |
---|---|---|
Population | 150,033 | 4,647 |
Median Age | 34.3 years | 28.9 years |
Median Income | $84,971 | $31,326 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 7.1 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Joliet vs Cochran
- In Joliet, the population is higher at 150,033, compared to 4,647 in Cochran.
- Residents in Joliet have a higher median age of 34.3 years compared to 28.9 years in Cochran.
- Joliet has a higher median income of $84,971 compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Joliet at 35.0% compared to 25.0% in Cochran.
- The poverty level is higher in Cochran at 19%, compared to 12% in Joliet.
- The unemployment rate in Joliet is higher at 7.1%, compared to 3.2% in Cochran.
Demographics
Demographics Joliet vs Cochran provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Joliet | Cochran |
---|---|---|
Black | 17 | 53 |
White | 36 | 40 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 34 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 3 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Joliet vs Cochran
- In Cochran, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 53% compared to 17% in Joliet.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cochran at 40% compared to 36% in Joliet.
- Both Joliet and Cochran have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Joliet at 34% compared to 2% in Cochran.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Joliet at 10% compared to 3% in Cochran.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Joliet at 1% compared to 0% in Cochran.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Joliet | Cochran |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 13.7% |
Depression | 19.1% | 21.8% |
Smoking | 16.9% | 20.0% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 13.6% |
Obesity | 37.4% | 38.5% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Joliet vs Cochran
- In Cochran, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.7% in Joliet.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cochran at 21.8% versus 19.1% in Joliet.
- Cochran has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 16.9% in Joliet.
- Binge drinking is more common in Joliet at 16.2% compared to 13.6% in Cochran.
- Cochran has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 37.4% in Joliet.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cochran at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Joliet.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Joliet | Cochran |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (2,247) | 1.2% (54) |
High School Diploma | 14.9% (22,362) | 12.2% (569) |
Less than High School | 17.5% (26,199) | 15.1% (703) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (23,354) | 12.7% (592) |
Education Levels Comparison: Joliet vs Cochran
- A higher percentage of residents in Joliet have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 1.2% in Cochran.
- A higher percentage of residents in Joliet hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 12.2% in Cochran.
- More residents in Joliet have less than a high school education at 17.5% compared to 15.1% in Cochran.
- A higher percentage of residents in Joliet hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 12.7% in Cochran.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.