Demographics details for Johnston, SC vs Woodburn, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Johnston, SC vs Woodburn, OR.
| Data | Johnston | Woodburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,078 | 27,290 |
| Median Age | 48.3 years | 39.2 years |
| Median Income | $31,910 | $58,916 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Johnston vs Woodburn
- The population in Woodburn is higher at 27,290, compared to 2,078 in Johnston.
- Residents in Johnston have a higher median age of 48.3 years compared to 39.2 years in Woodburn.
- Woodburn has a higher median income of $58,916, compared to $31,910 in Johnston.
- In Woodburn, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 34.0% in Johnston.
- Johnston has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 12% in Woodburn.
- The unemployment rate in Johnston is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.8% in Woodburn.
Demographics
Demographics Johnston vs Woodburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Johnston | Woodburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 72 | Data is updating |
| White | 16 | 22 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 59 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 17 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Johnston vs Woodburn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Johnston at 72% compared to 0% in Woodburn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodburn at 22% compared to 16% in Johnston.
- The Asian population is larger in Johnston at 2% compared to 1% in Woodburn.
- Woodburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 59%, compared to 6% in Johnston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodburn at 17%, compared to 3% in Johnston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Johnston and Woodburn at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Johnston | Woodburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 20.6% | 27.1% |
| Smoking | 24.6% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 42.3% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Johnston vs Woodburn
- More residents in Johnston report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 18.9% in Woodburn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Woodburn at 27.1% versus 20.6% in Johnston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Johnston at 24.6% compared to 18.0% in Woodburn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Woodburn at 14.4% compared to 13.5% in Johnston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Johnston at 42.3% compared to 40.5% in Woodburn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Johnston at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Woodburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Johnston | Woodburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.3% (68) | 3.6% (992) |
| High School Diploma | 33.4% (694) | 13.3% (3,628) |
| Less than High School | 16.6% (345) | 38.2% (10,414) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (251) | 9.4% (2,578) |
Education Levels Comparison: Johnston vs Woodburn
- In Woodburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 3.3% in Johnston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Johnston hold a high school diploma at 33.4% compared to 13.3% in Woodburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodburn at 38.2%, compared to 16.6% in Johnston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Johnston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 9.4% in Woodburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.