Demographics details for Jim falls, WI vs Margate, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jim falls, WI vs Margate, FL.
| Data | Jim falls | Margate |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 219 | 58,209 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 46.8 years |
| Median Income | $87,143 | $56,324 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Jim falls vs Margate
- The population in Margate is higher at 58,209, compared to 219 in Jim falls.
- The median age in Margate is higher at 46.8 years, compared to 40.6 years in Jim falls.
- Jim falls has a higher median income of $87,143 compared to $56,324 in Margate.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jim falls at 53.0% compared to 41.0% in Margate.
- The poverty level is higher in Margate at 11%, compared to 5% in Jim falls.
- The unemployment rate in Jim falls is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.6% in Margate.
Demographics
Demographics Jim falls vs Margate provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jim falls | Margate |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 34 |
| White | 100 | 23 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 25 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jim falls vs Margate
- In Margate, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 34% compared to 0% in Jim falls.
- Jim falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 23% in Margate.
- In Margate, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Jim falls.
- Margate has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 0% in Jim falls.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Margate at 14%, compared to 0% in Jim falls.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jim falls and Margate at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jim falls | Margate |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 24.5% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 18.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 25.0% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 34.0% | 30.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jim falls vs Margate
- In Margate, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.4% in Jim falls.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jim falls at 24.5% compared to 17.8% in Margate.
- Margate has a higher smoking rate at 18.9% compared to 17.2% in Jim falls.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jim falls at 25.0% compared to 14.6% in Margate.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jim falls at 34.0% compared to 30.3% in Margate.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jim falls at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Margate.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jim falls | Margate |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.5% (879) |
| High School Diploma | 14.2% (31) | 21.9% (12,751) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (30) | 13.9% (8,107) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.5% (47) | 19.7% (11,493) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jim falls vs Margate
- In Margate, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Jim falls.
- In Margate, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.9% compared to 14.2% in Jim falls.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Margate at 13.9%, compared to 13.7% in Jim falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jim falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.5% compared to 19.7% in Margate.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.