Demographics details for Jim falls, WI vs Leominster, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jim falls, WI vs Leominster, MA.
| Data | Jim falls | Leominster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 219 | 43,646 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $87,143 | $75,620 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Jim falls vs Leominster
- The population in Leominster is higher at 43,646, compared to 219 in Jim falls.
- The median age in Leominster is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 40.6 years in Jim falls.
- Jim falls has a higher median income of $87,143 compared to $75,620 in Leominster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jim falls at 53.0% compared to 38.0% in Leominster.
- The poverty level is higher in Leominster at 9%, compared to 5% in Jim falls.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Jim falls and Leominster at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Jim falls vs Leominster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jim falls | Leominster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 6 |
| White | 100 | 67 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 14 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jim falls vs Leominster
- In Leominster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Jim falls.
- Jim falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 67% in Leominster.
- In Leominster, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Jim falls.
- Leominster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 0% in Jim falls.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Leominster at 10%, compared to 0% in Jim falls.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jim falls and Leominster at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jim falls | Leominster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 24.5% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 25.0% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 34.0% | 32.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jim falls vs Leominster
- In Leominster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.4% in Jim falls.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jim falls at 24.5% compared to 23.5% in Leominster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jim falls at 17.2% compared to 15.5% in Leominster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jim falls at 25.0% compared to 16.9% in Leominster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jim falls at 34.0% compared to 32.8% in Leominster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jim falls at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Leominster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jim falls | Leominster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (477) |
| High School Diploma | 14.2% (31) | 18.2% (7,932) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (30) | 13.5% (5,889) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.5% (47) | 24.1% (10,530) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jim falls vs Leominster
- In Leominster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Jim falls.
- In Leominster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 14.2% in Jim falls.
- More residents in Jim falls have less than a high school education at 13.7% compared to 13.5% in Leominster.
- In Leominster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.1% compared to 21.5% in Jim falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.