Demographics details for Jesup, IA vs Worcester, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jesup, IA vs Worcester, MA.
Data | Jesup | Worcester |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,525 | 205,319 |
Median Age | 33.0 years | 34.3 years |
Median Income | $83,519 | $63,011 |
Married Families | 46.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Jesup vs Worcester
- The population in Worcester is higher at 205,319, compared to 2,525 in Jesup.
- The median age in Worcester is higher at 34.3 years, compared to 33.0 years in Jesup.
- Jesup has a higher median income of $83,519 compared to $63,011 in Worcester.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jesup at 46.0% compared to 29.0% in Worcester.
- The poverty level is higher in Worcester at 12%, compared to 5% in Jesup.
- Worcester has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 2.5% in Jesup.
Demographics
Demographics Jesup vs Worcester provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Jesup | Worcester |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 13 |
White | 97 | 44 |
Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
Hispanic | 1 | 24 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jesup vs Worcester
- In Worcester, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 0% in Jesup.
- Jesup has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 44% in Worcester.
- In Worcester, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Jesup.
- Worcester has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 1% in Jesup.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Worcester at 12%, compared to 2% in Jesup.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jesup and Worcester at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Jesup | Worcester |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 18.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 11.8% |
Depression | 18.0% | 23.1% |
Smoking | 16.7% | 17.1% |
Binge Drinking | 24.2% | 15.5% |
Obesity | 34.8% | 34.8% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jesup vs Worcester
- In Worcester, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.1% in Jesup.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Worcester at 23.1% versus 18.0% in Jesup.
- Worcester has a higher smoking rate at 17.1% compared to 16.7% in Jesup.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jesup at 24.2% compared to 15.5% in Worcester.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 34.8%.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Worcester at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Jesup.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Jesup | Worcester |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.7% (3,577) |
High School Diploma | 15.4% (389) | 15.6% (31,987) |
Less than High School | 5.2% (132) | 16.0% (32,925) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (306) | 21.5% (44,155) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jesup vs Worcester
- In Worcester, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Jesup.
- In Worcester, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.6% compared to 15.4% in Jesup.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Worcester at 16.0%, compared to 5.2% in Jesup.
- In Worcester, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.5% compared to 12.1% in Jesup.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.