Demographics details for Jesup, IA vs Springfield, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jesup, IA vs Springfield, OR.
| Data | Jesup | Springfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,525 | 61,400 |
| Median Age | 33.0 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $83,519 | $60,982 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Jesup vs Springfield
- The population in Springfield is higher at 61,400, compared to 2,525 in Jesup.
- The median age in Springfield is higher at 37.3 years, compared to 33.0 years in Jesup.
- Jesup has a higher median income of $83,519 compared to $60,982 in Springfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jesup at 46.0% compared to 36.0% in Springfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Springfield at 10%, compared to 5% in Jesup.
- Springfield has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 2.5% in Jesup.
Demographics
Demographics Jesup vs Springfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jesup | Springfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 97 | 73 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Jesup vs Springfield
- In Springfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Jesup.
- Jesup has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 73% in Springfield.
- In Springfield, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Jesup.
- Springfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 1% in Jesup.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Springfield at 9%, compared to 2% in Jesup.
- In Springfield, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Jesup.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jesup | Springfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 18.0% | 28.9% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 16.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.2% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jesup vs Springfield
- In Springfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 15.1% in Jesup.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Springfield at 28.9% versus 18.0% in Jesup.
- Springfield has a higher smoking rate at 16.8% compared to 16.7% in Jesup.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jesup at 24.2% compared to 16.9% in Springfield.
- Springfield has higher obesity rates at 36.4% compared to 34.8% in Jesup.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Springfield at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Jesup.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jesup | Springfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (528) |
| High School Diploma | 15.4% (389) | 14.9% (9,128) |
| Less than High School | 5.2% (132) | 14.4% (8,821) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (306) | 14.2% (8,749) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jesup vs Springfield
- In Springfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Jesup.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jesup hold a high school diploma at 15.4% compared to 14.9% in Springfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Springfield at 14.4%, compared to 5.2% in Jesup.
- In Springfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 12.1% in Jesup.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.