Demographics details for Jesup, IA vs Salem, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jesup, IA vs Salem, UT.
| Data | Jesup | Salem |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,525 | 10,393 |
| Median Age | 33.0 years | 28.3 years |
| Median Income | $83,519 | $101,700 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 3% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Jesup vs Salem
- The population in Salem is higher at 10,393, compared to 2,525 in Jesup.
- Residents in Jesup have a higher median age of 33.0 years compared to 28.3 years in Salem.
- Salem has a higher median income of $101,700, compared to $83,519 in Jesup.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jesup at 46.0% compared to 44.0% in Salem.
- Jesup has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 3% in Salem.
- The unemployment rate in Jesup is higher at 2.5%, compared to 2.0% in Salem.
Demographics
Demographics Jesup vs Salem provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jesup | Salem |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 97 | 87 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jesup vs Salem
- In Salem, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Jesup.
- Jesup has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 87% in Salem.
- Both Jesup and Salem have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Salem has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Jesup.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Salem at 8%, compared to 2% in Jesup.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jesup and Salem at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jesup | Salem |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 18.0% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 6.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.2% | 8.8% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 29.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jesup vs Salem
- More residents in Jesup report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.2% in Salem.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Salem at 23.5% versus 18.0% in Jesup.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jesup at 16.7% compared to 6.7% in Salem.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jesup at 24.2% compared to 8.8% in Salem.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jesup at 34.8% compared to 29.2% in Salem.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jesup at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Salem.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jesup | Salem |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.4% (389) | 8.9% (921) |
| Less than High School | 5.2% (132) | 2.1% (220) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (306) | 19.9% (2,072) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jesup vs Salem
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Jesup and Salem at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jesup hold a high school diploma at 15.4% compared to 8.9% in Salem.
- More residents in Jesup have less than a high school education at 5.2% compared to 2.1% in Salem.
- In Salem, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 12.1% in Jesup.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.