Demographics details for Jesup, IA vs Piper city, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jesup, IA vs Piper city, IL.
| Data | Jesup | Piper city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,525 | 729 |
| Median Age | 33.0 years | 48.3 years |
| Median Income | $83,519 | $38,750 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Jesup vs Piper city
- In Jesup, the population is higher at 2,525, compared to 729 in Piper city.
- The median age in Piper city is higher at 48.3 years, compared to 33.0 years in Jesup.
- Jesup has a higher median income of $83,519 compared to $38,750 in Piper city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jesup at 46.0% compared to 40.0% in Piper city.
- The poverty level is higher in Piper city at 11%, compared to 5% in Jesup.
- Piper city has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.5% in Jesup.
Demographics
Demographics Jesup vs Piper city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jesup | Piper city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 97 | 94 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jesup vs Piper city
- In Piper city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Jesup.
- Jesup has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 94% in Piper city.
- Both Jesup and Piper city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Piper city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Jesup.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jesup at 2% compared to 1% in Piper city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jesup and Piper city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jesup | Piper city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 12.8% |
| Depression | 18.0% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.2% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 38.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jesup vs Piper city
- In Piper city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.1% in Jesup.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Piper city at 23.2% versus 18.0% in Jesup.
- Piper city has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 16.7% in Jesup.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jesup at 24.2% compared to 17.3% in Piper city.
- Piper city has higher obesity rates at 38.4% compared to 34.8% in Jesup.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Piper city at 26.0% compared to 10.0% in Jesup.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jesup | Piper city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.1% (1) |
| High School Diploma | 15.4% (389) | 30.3% (221) |
| Less than High School | 5.2% (132) | 10.8% (79) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (306) | 5.8% (42) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jesup vs Piper city
- In Piper city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Jesup.
- In Piper city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.3% compared to 15.4% in Jesup.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Piper city at 10.8%, compared to 5.2% in Jesup.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jesup hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 5.8% in Piper city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.