Demographics details for Jesup, IA vs Panaca, NV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jesup, IA vs Panaca, NV.
Data | Jesup | Panaca |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,525 | 1,039 |
Median Age | 33.0 years | 34.3 years |
Median Income | $83,519 | $68,073 |
Married Families | 46.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Jesup vs Panaca
- In Jesup, the population is higher at 2,525, compared to 1,039 in Panaca.
- The median age in Panaca is higher at 34.3 years, compared to 33.0 years in Jesup.
- Jesup has a higher median income of $83,519 compared to $68,073 in Panaca.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jesup at 46.0% compared to 45.0% in Panaca.
- The poverty level is higher in Panaca at 12%, compared to 5% in Jesup.
- Panaca has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.5% in Jesup.
Demographics
Demographics Jesup vs Panaca provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Jesup | Panaca |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 97 | 92 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Jesup vs Panaca
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Jesup and Panaca at 0%.
- Jesup has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 92% in Panaca.
- Both Jesup and Panaca have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jesup at 1% compared to 0% in Panaca.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Panaca at 3%, compared to 2% in Jesup.
- In Panaca, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Jesup.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Jesup | Panaca |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 11.6% |
Depression | 18.0% | 22.8% |
Smoking | 16.7% | 18.0% |
Binge Drinking | 24.2% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 34.8% | 33.4% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jesup vs Panaca
- In Panaca, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 15.1% in Jesup.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Panaca at 22.8% versus 18.0% in Jesup.
- Panaca has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 16.7% in Jesup.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jesup at 24.2% compared to 18.2% in Panaca.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jesup at 34.8% compared to 33.4% in Panaca.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jesup at 10.0% compared to 6.0% in Panaca.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Jesup | Panaca |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 15.4% (389) | 20.0% (208) |
Less than High School | 5.2% (132) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (306) | 16.3% (169) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jesup vs Panaca
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Jesup and Panaca at 0.0%.
- In Panaca, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.0% compared to 15.4% in Jesup.
- More residents in Jesup have less than a high school education at 5.2% compared to 0.0% in Panaca.
- In Panaca, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 12.1% in Jesup.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.