Demographics details for Jesup, IA vs Litchfield park, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jesup, IA vs Litchfield park, AZ.
| Data | Jesup | Litchfield park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,525 | 6,960 |
| Median Age | 33.0 years | 47.7 years |
| Median Income | $83,519 | $117,601 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Jesup vs Litchfield park
- The population in Litchfield park is higher at 6,960, compared to 2,525 in Jesup.
- The median age in Litchfield park is higher at 47.7 years, compared to 33.0 years in Jesup.
- Litchfield park has a higher median income of $117,601, compared to $83,519 in Jesup.
- In Litchfield park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 46.0% in Jesup.
- The poverty level is identical in both Jesup and Litchfield park at 5%.
- Litchfield park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 2.5% in Jesup.
Demographics
Demographics Jesup vs Litchfield park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jesup | Litchfield park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 97 | 57 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jesup vs Litchfield park
- In Litchfield park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Jesup.
- Jesup has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 57% in Litchfield park.
- In Litchfield park, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Jesup.
- Litchfield park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 1% in Jesup.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Litchfield park at 12%, compared to 2% in Jesup.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jesup and Litchfield park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jesup | Litchfield park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 8.3% |
| Depression | 18.0% | 18.9% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 10.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.2% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 27.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jesup vs Litchfield park
- More residents in Jesup report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 15.0% in Litchfield park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Litchfield park at 18.9% versus 18.0% in Jesup.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jesup at 16.7% compared to 10.7% in Litchfield park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jesup at 24.2% compared to 18.9% in Litchfield park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jesup at 34.8% compared to 27.2% in Litchfield park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Litchfield park at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Jesup.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jesup | Litchfield park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 15.4% (389) | 11.2% (777) |
| Less than High School | 5.2% (132) | 2.2% (150) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (306) | 36.0% (2,504) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jesup vs Litchfield park
- In Litchfield park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Jesup.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jesup hold a high school diploma at 15.4% compared to 11.2% in Litchfield park.
- More residents in Jesup have less than a high school education at 5.2% compared to 2.2% in Litchfield park.
- In Litchfield park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 12.1% in Jesup.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.