Demographics details for Jessup, PA vs Hanford, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jessup, PA vs Hanford, CA.
| Data | Jessup | Hanford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,488 | 58,470 |
| Median Age | 44.9 years | 32.7 years |
| Median Income | $58,869 | $73,819 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 7.0 |
Population Comparison: Jessup vs Hanford
- The population in Hanford is higher at 58,470, compared to 4,488 in Jessup.
- Residents in Jessup have a higher median age of 44.9 years compared to 32.7 years in Hanford.
- Hanford has a higher median income of $73,819, compared to $58,869 in Jessup.
- In Hanford, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 34.0% in Jessup.
- The poverty level is higher in Hanford at 13%, compared to 11% in Jessup.
- Hanford has a higher unemployment rate at 7.0% compared to 4.1% in Jessup.
Demographics
Demographics Jessup vs Hanford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jessup | Hanford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 7 |
| White | 76 | 23 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 50 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Jessup vs Hanford
- In Hanford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 1% in Jessup.
- Jessup has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 23% in Hanford.
- In Hanford, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Jessup.
- Hanford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 50%, compared to 9% in Jessup.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hanford at 15%, compared to 13% in Jessup.
- In Hanford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Jessup.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jessup | Hanford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 23.0% | 19.4% |
| Smoking | 16.8% | 14.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 31.1% | 33.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jessup vs Hanford
- In Hanford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 16.2% in Jessup.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jessup at 23.0% compared to 19.4% in Hanford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jessup at 16.8% compared to 14.0% in Hanford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jessup at 18.6% compared to 16.4% in Hanford.
- Hanford has higher obesity rates at 33.3% compared to 31.1% in Jessup.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jessup at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Hanford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jessup | Hanford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (31) | 1.7% (991) |
| High School Diploma | 27.2% (1,221) | 14.0% (8,215) |
| Less than High School | 11.1% (498) | 21.2% (12,424) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.0% (852) | 11.6% (6,806) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jessup vs Hanford
- In Hanford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.7% in Jessup.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jessup hold a high school diploma at 27.2% compared to 14.0% in Hanford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hanford at 21.2%, compared to 11.1% in Jessup.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jessup hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.0% compared to 11.6% in Hanford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.