Demographics details for Jessup, MD vs Greenville, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jessup, MD vs Greenville, MS.
| Data | Jessup | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,602 | 28,017 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 38.7 years |
| Median Income | $140,561 | $35,148 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Jessup vs Greenville
- The population in Greenville is higher at 28,017, compared to 9,602 in Jessup.
- The median age in Greenville is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 36.8 years in Jessup.
- Jessup has a higher median income of $140,561 compared to $35,148 in Greenville.
- In Greenville, the percentage of married families is higher at 25.0%, compared to 24.0% in Jessup.
- The poverty level is higher in Greenville at 30%, compared to 6% in Jessup.
- Greenville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 4.2% in Jessup.
Demographics
Demographics Jessup vs Greenville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jessup | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 54 | 87 |
| White | 24 | 11 |
| Asian | 6 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 9 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jessup vs Greenville
- In Greenville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 87% compared to 54% in Jessup.
- Jessup has a higher percentage of White residents at 24% compared to 11% in Greenville.
- The Asian population is larger in Jessup at 6% compared to 1% in Greenville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jessup at 9% compared to 0% in Greenville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jessup at 6% compared to 1% in Greenville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Jessup at 1% compared to 0% in Greenville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jessup | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 16.3% |
| Depression | 15.4% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 26.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 10.6% |
| Obesity | 39.6% | 46.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 2.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jessup vs Greenville
- In Greenville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 13.7% in Jessup.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Greenville at 21.2% versus 15.4% in Jessup.
- Greenville has a higher smoking rate at 26.7% compared to 15.0% in Jessup.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jessup at 16.8% compared to 10.6% in Greenville.
- Greenville has higher obesity rates at 46.0% compared to 39.6% in Jessup.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Greenville at 28.0% compared to 2.0% in Jessup.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jessup | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (143) | 1.8% (501) |
| High School Diploma | 15.1% (1,453) | 20.2% (5,661) |
| Less than High School | 24.7% (2,373) | 15.5% (4,352) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (1,760) | 14.5% (4,052) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jessup vs Greenville
- In Greenville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.5% in Jessup.
- In Greenville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 15.1% in Jessup.
- More residents in Jessup have less than a high school education at 24.7% compared to 15.5% in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jessup hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 14.5% in Greenville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.