Demographics details for Jessup, MD vs Central falls, RI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jessup, MD vs Central falls, RI.
| Data | Jessup | Central falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,602 | 22,490 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 31.5 years |
| Median Income | $140,561 | $43,092 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Jessup vs Central falls
- The population in Central falls is higher at 22,490, compared to 9,602 in Jessup.
- Residents in Jessup have a higher median age of 36.8 years compared to 31.5 years in Central falls.
- Jessup has a higher median income of $140,561 compared to $43,092 in Central falls.
- In Central falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 29.0%, compared to 24.0% in Jessup.
- The poverty level is higher in Central falls at 20%, compared to 6% in Jessup.
- Central falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 4.2% in Jessup.
Demographics
Demographics Jessup vs Central falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jessup | Central falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 54 | 8 |
| White | 24 | 4 |
| Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 69 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Jessup vs Central falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jessup at 54% compared to 8% in Central falls.
- Jessup has a higher percentage of White residents at 24% compared to 4% in Central falls.
- The Asian population is larger in Jessup at 6% compared to 0% in Central falls.
- Central falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 69%, compared to 9% in Jessup.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central falls at 18%, compared to 6% in Jessup.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jessup and Central falls at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jessup | Central falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 17.4% |
| Depression | 15.4% | 26.7% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 22.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 39.6% | 40.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 2.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jessup vs Central falls
- In Central falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 13.7% in Jessup.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central falls at 26.7% versus 15.4% in Jessup.
- Central falls has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 15.0% in Jessup.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jessup at 16.8% compared to 14.2% in Central falls.
- Central falls has higher obesity rates at 40.6% compared to 39.6% in Jessup.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central falls at 15.0% compared to 2.0% in Jessup.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jessup | Central falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (143) | 4.7% (1,048) |
| High School Diploma | 15.1% (1,453) | 15.1% (3,406) |
| Less than High School | 24.7% (2,373) | 44.1% (9,911) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (1,760) | 5.6% (1,270) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jessup vs Central falls
- In Central falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 1.5% in Jessup.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 15.1%.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central falls at 44.1%, compared to 24.7% in Jessup.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jessup hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 5.6% in Central falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.