Demographics details for Jersey city, NJ vs Port clinton, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Jersey city, NJ vs Port clinton, OH.

Data Jersey city Port clinton
Population 286,670 5,966
Median Age 34.6 years 44.9 years
Median Income $91,151 $55,534
Married Families 36.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 14% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Jersey city vs Port clinton

  • In Jersey city, the population is higher at 286,670, compared to 5,966 in Port clinton.
  • The median age in Port clinton is higher at 44.9 years, compared to 34.6 years in Jersey city.
  • Jersey city has a higher median income of $91,151 compared to $55,534 in Port clinton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Jersey city at 36.0% compared to 35.0% in Port clinton.
  • Jersey city has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in Port clinton.
  • The unemployment rate in Jersey city is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in Port clinton.

Demographics

Demographics Jersey city vs Port clinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Jersey city Port clinton
Black 22 3
White 12 82
Asian 26 Data is updating
Hispanic 27 7
Two or More Races 12 8
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Jersey city vs Port clinton

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jersey city at 22% compared to 3% in Port clinton.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Port clinton at 82% compared to 12% in Jersey city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Jersey city at 26% compared to 0% in Port clinton.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Jersey city at 27% compared to 7% in Port clinton.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Jersey city at 12% compared to 8% in Port clinton.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Jersey city at 1% compared to 0% in Port clinton.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Jersey city Port clinton
Mental Health Not Good 13.8% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 10.7% 13.5%
Depression 16.2% 25.1%
Smoking 13.0% 24.0%
Binge Drinking 14.1% 17.9%
Obesity 25.3% 40.7%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Jersey city vs Port clinton

  • In Port clinton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 13.8% in Jersey city.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Port clinton at 25.1% versus 16.2% in Jersey city.
  • Port clinton has a higher smoking rate at 24.0% compared to 13.0% in Jersey city.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Port clinton at 17.9% compared to 14.1% in Jersey city.
  • Port clinton has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 25.3% in Jersey city.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port clinton at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Jersey city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Jersey city Port clinton
No Schooling 1.6% (4,607) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 14.1% (40,524) 21.7% (1,296)
Less than High School 11.7% (33,584) 17.1% (1,023)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 37.5% (107,636) 13.8% (825)

Education Levels Comparison: Jersey city vs Port clinton

  • A higher percentage of residents in Jersey city have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Port clinton.
  • In Port clinton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 14.1% in Jersey city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port clinton at 17.1%, compared to 11.7% in Jersey city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Jersey city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.5% compared to 13.8% in Port clinton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.