Demographics details for Jersey city, NJ vs Live oak, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jersey city, NJ vs Live oak, FL.
| Data | Jersey city | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 286,670 | 7,034 |
| Median Age | 34.6 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $91,151 | $43,664 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Jersey city vs Live oak
- In Jersey city, the population is higher at 286,670, compared to 7,034 in Live oak.
- The median age in Live oak is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 34.6 years in Jersey city.
- Jersey city has a higher median income of $91,151 compared to $43,664 in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jersey city at 36.0% compared to 31.0% in Live oak.
- The poverty level is higher in Live oak at 16%, compared to 14% in Jersey city.
- The unemployment rate in Jersey city is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.2% in Live oak.
Demographics
Demographics Jersey city vs Live oak provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jersey city | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 38 |
| White | 12 | 41 |
| Asian | 26 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 27 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 12 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jersey city vs Live oak
- In Live oak, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 22% in Jersey city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Live oak at 41% compared to 12% in Jersey city.
- The Asian population is larger in Jersey city at 26% compared to 0% in Live oak.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jersey city at 27% compared to 9% in Live oak.
- Both Jersey city and Live oak have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 12%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Jersey city at 1% compared to 0% in Live oak.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jersey city | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 16.2% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 13.0% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 25.3% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jersey city vs Live oak
- In Live oak, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 13.8% in Jersey city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Live oak at 19.3% versus 16.2% in Jersey city.
- Live oak has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 13.0% in Jersey city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Live oak at 14.9% compared to 14.1% in Jersey city.
- Live oak has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 25.3% in Jersey city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Live oak at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Jersey city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jersey city | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (4,607) | 2.1% (147) |
| High School Diploma | 14.1% (40,524) | 25.0% (1,755) |
| Less than High School | 11.7% (33,584) | 11.3% (796) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 37.5% (107,636) | 7.7% (545) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jersey city vs Live oak
- In Live oak, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.6% in Jersey city.
- In Live oak, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 14.1% in Jersey city.
- More residents in Jersey city have less than a high school education at 11.7% compared to 11.3% in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jersey city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.5% compared to 7.7% in Live oak.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.