Demographics details for Jersey city, NJ vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jersey city, NJ vs Gallatin, TN.
| Data | Jersey city | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 286,670 | 48,194 |
| Median Age | 34.6 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $91,151 | $68,548 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Jersey city vs Gallatin
- In Jersey city, the population is higher at 286,670, compared to 48,194 in Gallatin.
- The median age in Gallatin is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 34.6 years in Jersey city.
- Jersey city has a higher median income of $91,151 compared to $68,548 in Gallatin.
- In Gallatin, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 36.0% in Jersey city.
- Jersey city has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 13% in Gallatin.
- The unemployment rate in Jersey city is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Jersey city vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jersey city | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 15 |
| White | 12 | 67 |
| Asian | 26 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jersey city vs Gallatin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jersey city at 22% compared to 15% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gallatin at 67% compared to 12% in Jersey city.
- The Asian population is larger in Jersey city at 26% compared to 2% in Gallatin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jersey city at 27% compared to 9% in Gallatin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jersey city at 12% compared to 7% in Gallatin.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Jersey city at 1% compared to 0% in Gallatin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jersey city | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 16.2% | 27.7% |
| Smoking | 13.0% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 25.3% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jersey city vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 13.8% in Jersey city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 16.2% in Jersey city.
- Gallatin has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 13.0% in Jersey city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gallatin at 14.7% compared to 14.1% in Jersey city.
- Gallatin has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 25.3% in Jersey city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gallatin at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Jersey city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jersey city | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (4,607) | 1.2% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 14.1% (40,524) | 13.9% (6,695) |
| Less than High School | 11.7% (33,584) | 11.6% (5,600) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 37.5% (107,636) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jersey city vs Gallatin
- A higher percentage of residents in Jersey city have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.2% in Gallatin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jersey city hold a high school diploma at 14.1% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- More residents in Jersey city have less than a high school education at 11.7% compared to 11.6% in Gallatin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jersey city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.5% compared to 19.6% in Gallatin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.