Demographics details for Jeffersonville, IN vs Silt, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jeffersonville, IN vs Silt, CO.
| Data | Jeffersonville | Silt |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 51,030 | 3,594 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 31.0 years |
| Median Income | $67,566 | $72,450 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Jeffersonville vs Silt
- In Jeffersonville, the population is higher at 51,030, compared to 3,594 in Silt.
- Residents in Jeffersonville have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 31.0 years in Silt.
- Silt has a higher median income of $72,450, compared to $67,566 in Jeffersonville.
- In Silt, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 37.0% in Jeffersonville.
- Jeffersonville has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Silt.
- Silt has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.1% in Jeffersonville.
Demographics
Demographics Jeffersonville vs Silt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jeffersonville | Silt |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 1 |
| White | 75 | 43 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 39 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jeffersonville vs Silt
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jeffersonville at 12% compared to 1% in Silt.
- Jeffersonville has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 43% in Silt.
- The Asian population is larger in Jeffersonville at 1% compared to 0% in Silt.
- Silt has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 5% in Jeffersonville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Silt at 17%, compared to 7% in Jeffersonville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jeffersonville and Silt at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jeffersonville | Silt |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 20.2% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 21.2% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | 25.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jeffersonville vs Silt
- More residents in Jeffersonville report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 16.3% in Silt.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jeffersonville at 23.5% compared to 23.2% in Silt.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jeffersonville at 20.2% compared to 15.5% in Silt.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Silt at 21.2% compared to 16.9% in Jeffersonville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jeffersonville at 40.2% compared to 25.8% in Silt.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jeffersonville at 13.0% compared to 6.0% in Silt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jeffersonville | Silt |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (293) | 2.2% (79) |
| High School Diploma | 18.6% (9,472) | 11.4% (409) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (4,952) | 17.0% (611) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (8,649) | 11.0% (397) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jeffersonville vs Silt
- In Silt, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.6% in Jeffersonville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jeffersonville hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 11.4% in Silt.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Silt at 17.0%, compared to 9.7% in Jeffersonville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jeffersonville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 11.0% in Silt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.