Demographics details for Jeffersonville, IN vs Monroe, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jeffersonville, IN vs Monroe, MI.
Data | Jeffersonville | Monroe |
---|---|---|
Population | 51,030 | 20,295 |
Median Age | 38.6 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $67,566 | $57,779 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Jeffersonville vs Monroe
- In Jeffersonville, the population is higher at 51,030, compared to 20,295 in Monroe.
- Residents in Jeffersonville have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 36.6 years in Monroe.
- Jeffersonville has a higher median income of $67,566 compared to $57,779 in Monroe.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jeffersonville at 37.0% compared to 33.0% in Monroe.
- The poverty level is higher in Monroe at 12%, compared to 10% in Jeffersonville.
- Monroe has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 4.1% in Jeffersonville.
Demographics
Demographics Jeffersonville vs Monroe provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Jeffersonville | Monroe |
---|---|---|
Black | 12 | 6 |
White | 75 | 86 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 5 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jeffersonville vs Monroe
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jeffersonville at 12% compared to 6% in Monroe.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Monroe at 86% compared to 75% in Jeffersonville.
- Both Jeffersonville and Monroe have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jeffersonville at 5% compared to 3% in Monroe.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jeffersonville at 7% compared to 4% in Monroe.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jeffersonville and Monroe at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Jeffersonville | Monroe |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 19.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 13.2% |
Depression | 23.5% | 25.7% |
Smoking | 20.2% | 21.6% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 17.5% |
Obesity | 40.2% | 43.7% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jeffersonville vs Monroe
- In Monroe, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.3% in Jeffersonville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Monroe at 25.7% versus 23.5% in Jeffersonville.
- Monroe has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 20.2% in Jeffersonville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Monroe at 17.5% compared to 16.9% in Jeffersonville.
- Monroe has higher obesity rates at 43.7% compared to 40.2% in Jeffersonville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Monroe at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Jeffersonville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Jeffersonville | Monroe |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (293) | 0.5% (105) |
High School Diploma | 18.6% (9,472) | 17.0% (3,449) |
Less than High School | 9.7% (4,952) | 13.0% (2,633) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (8,649) | 13.2% (2,681) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jeffersonville vs Monroe
- A higher percentage of residents in Jeffersonville have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Monroe.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jeffersonville hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 17.0% in Monroe.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Monroe at 13.0%, compared to 9.7% in Jeffersonville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jeffersonville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 13.2% in Monroe.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.