Demographics details for Jeffersonville, IN vs Crandall, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jeffersonville, IN vs Crandall, TX.
Data | Jeffersonville | Crandall |
---|---|---|
Population | 51,030 | 4,641 |
Median Age | 38.6 years | 37.3 years |
Median Income | $67,566 | $101,829 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Jeffersonville vs Crandall
- In Jeffersonville, the population is higher at 51,030, compared to 4,641 in Crandall.
- Residents in Jeffersonville have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 37.3 years in Crandall.
- Crandall has a higher median income of $101,829, compared to $67,566 in Jeffersonville.
- In Crandall, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 37.0% in Jeffersonville.
- Jeffersonville has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Crandall.
- The unemployment rate in Jeffersonville is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.5% in Crandall.
Demographics
Demographics Jeffersonville vs Crandall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Jeffersonville | Crandall |
---|---|---|
Black | 12 | 3 |
White | 75 | 75 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jeffersonville vs Crandall
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jeffersonville at 12% compared to 3% in Crandall.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Jeffersonville and Crandall at 75%.
- The Asian population is larger in Jeffersonville at 1% compared to 0% in Crandall.
- Crandall has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 5% in Jeffersonville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jeffersonville at 7% compared to 3% in Crandall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jeffersonville and Crandall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Jeffersonville | Crandall |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 11.3% |
Depression | 23.5% | 25.2% |
Smoking | 20.2% | 17.6% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 19.7% |
Obesity | 40.2% | 34.3% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jeffersonville vs Crandall
- In Crandall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 17.3% in Jeffersonville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Crandall at 25.2% versus 23.5% in Jeffersonville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jeffersonville at 20.2% compared to 17.6% in Crandall.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Crandall at 19.7% compared to 16.9% in Jeffersonville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jeffersonville at 40.2% compared to 34.3% in Crandall.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jeffersonville at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Crandall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Jeffersonville | Crandall |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (293) | 0.8% (37) |
High School Diploma | 18.6% (9,472) | 13.4% (622) |
Less than High School | 9.7% (4,952) | 9.0% (420) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (8,649) | 12.8% (594) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jeffersonville vs Crandall
- In Crandall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Jeffersonville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jeffersonville hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 13.4% in Crandall.
- More residents in Jeffersonville have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 9.0% in Crandall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jeffersonville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 12.8% in Crandall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.