Demographics details for Jefferson, SD vs Rosemead, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jefferson, SD vs Rosemead, CA.
| Data | Jefferson | Rosemead |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 457 | 49,791 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 43.1 years |
| Median Income | $77,601 | $70,073 |
| Married Families | 59.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.3 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Jefferson vs Rosemead
- The population in Rosemead is higher at 49,791, compared to 457 in Jefferson.
- The median age in Rosemead is higher at 43.1 years, compared to 37.1 years in Jefferson.
- Jefferson has a higher median income of $77,601 compared to $70,073 in Rosemead.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jefferson at 59.0% compared to 42.0% in Rosemead.
- The poverty level is higher in Rosemead at 14%, compared to 5% in Jefferson.
- Rosemead has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 2.3% in Jefferson.
Demographics
Demographics Jefferson vs Rosemead provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jefferson | Rosemead |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 85 | -4 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 65 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 32 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | 5 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Jefferson vs Rosemead
- In Rosemead, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Jefferson.
- Jefferson has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to -4% in Rosemead.
- In Rosemead, the Asian population stands at 65%, greater than 0% in Jefferson.
- Rosemead has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 6% in Jefferson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rosemead at 5%, compared to 4% in Jefferson.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Jefferson at 5% compared to 1% in Rosemead.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jefferson | Rosemead |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 16.7% | 12.2% |
| Smoking | 14.5% | 12.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 11.0% |
| Obesity | 38.6% | 21.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jefferson vs Rosemead
- In Rosemead, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 12.5% in Jefferson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jefferson at 16.7% compared to 12.2% in Rosemead.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jefferson at 14.5% compared to 12.3% in Rosemead.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jefferson at 20.4% compared to 11.0% in Rosemead.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jefferson at 38.6% compared to 21.6% in Rosemead.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jefferson at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Rosemead.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jefferson | Rosemead |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 10.4% (5,181) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (102) | 17.8% (8,852) |
| Less than High School | 7.9% (36) | 31.2% (15,559) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.0% (105) | 16.5% (8,228) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jefferson vs Rosemead
- In Rosemead, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 10.4% compared to 0.0% in Jefferson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jefferson hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 17.8% in Rosemead.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rosemead at 31.2%, compared to 7.9% in Jefferson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jefferson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 16.5% in Rosemead.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.