Demographics details for Jefferson, SD vs Enon valley, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Jefferson, SD vs Enon valley, PA.

Data Jefferson Enon valley
Population 457 295
Median Age 37.1 years 41.7 years
Median Income $77,601 $56,875
Married Families 59.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level 5% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 2.3 Data is updating

Population Comparison: Jefferson vs Enon valley

  • In Jefferson, the population is higher at 457, compared to 295 in Enon valley.
  • The median age in Enon valley is higher at 41.7 years, compared to 37.1 years in Jefferson.
  • Jefferson has a higher median income of $77,601 compared to $56,875 in Enon valley.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Jefferson at 59.0% compared to 50.0% in Enon valley.
  • Jefferson has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Enon valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Jefferson is higher at 2.3%, compared to 0.0% in Enon valley.

Demographics

Demographics Jefferson vs Enon valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Jefferson Enon valley
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 85 74
Asian Data is updating 6
Hispanic 6 Data is updating
Two or More Races 4 20
American Indian 5 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Jefferson vs Enon valley

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Jefferson and Enon valley at 0%.
  • Jefferson has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 74% in Enon valley.
  • In Enon valley, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Jefferson.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Jefferson at 6% compared to 0% in Enon valley.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Enon valley at 20%, compared to 4% in Jefferson.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Jefferson at 5% compared to 0% in Enon valley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Jefferson Enon valley
Mental Health Not Good 12.5% 17.0%
Physical Health Not Good 8.2% 11.4%
Depression 16.7% 23.6%
Smoking 14.5% 19.6%
Binge Drinking 20.4% 20.0%
Obesity 38.6% 35.1%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Jefferson vs Enon valley

  • In Enon valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 12.5% in Jefferson.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Enon valley at 23.6% versus 16.7% in Jefferson.
  • Enon valley has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 14.5% in Jefferson.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Jefferson at 20.4% compared to 20.0% in Enon valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Jefferson at 38.6% compared to 35.1% in Enon valley.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Enon valley at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Jefferson.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Jefferson Enon valley
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 22.3% (102) 21.4% (63)
Less than High School 7.9% (36) 8.5% (25)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 23.0% (105) 14.2% (42)

Education Levels Comparison: Jefferson vs Enon valley

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Jefferson and Enon valley at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Jefferson hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 21.4% in Enon valley.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Enon valley at 8.5%, compared to 7.9% in Jefferson.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Jefferson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 14.2% in Enon valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.