Demographics details for Jefferson, OR vs Sneads ferry, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jefferson, OR vs Sneads ferry, NC.
Data | Jefferson | Sneads ferry |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,304 | 2,140 |
Median Age | 31.7 years | 50.3 years |
Median Income | $87,604 | $40,278 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 51.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Jefferson vs Sneads ferry
- In Jefferson, the population is higher at 3,304, compared to 2,140 in Sneads ferry.
- The median age in Sneads ferry is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 31.7 years in Jefferson.
- Jefferson has a higher median income of $87,604 compared to $40,278 in Sneads ferry.
- In Sneads ferry, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 39.0% in Jefferson.
- Jefferson has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Sneads ferry.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Jefferson and Sneads ferry at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Jefferson vs Sneads ferry provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Jefferson | Sneads ferry |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 1 |
White | 67 | 89 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 20 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 2 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jefferson vs Sneads ferry
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jefferson at 2% compared to 1% in Sneads ferry.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sneads ferry at 89% compared to 67% in Jefferson.
- In Sneads ferry, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Jefferson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jefferson at 20% compared to 6% in Sneads ferry.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jefferson at 10% compared to 2% in Sneads ferry.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Jefferson at 1% compared to 0% in Sneads ferry.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Jefferson | Sneads ferry |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 15.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 9.9% |
Depression | 28.9% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 16.5% | 15.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 18.6% |
Obesity | 36.5% | 33.6% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jefferson vs Sneads ferry
- More residents in Jefferson report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.6% in Sneads ferry.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jefferson at 28.9% compared to 23.8% in Sneads ferry.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jefferson at 16.5% compared to 15.1% in Sneads ferry.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sneads ferry at 18.6% compared to 16.4% in Jefferson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jefferson at 36.5% compared to 33.6% in Sneads ferry.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sneads ferry at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Jefferson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Jefferson | Sneads ferry |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.4% (78) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 13.0% (430) | 23.2% (496) |
Less than High School | 13.9% (458) | 17.9% (382) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (363) | 10.2% (219) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jefferson vs Sneads ferry
- A higher percentage of residents in Jefferson have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Sneads ferry.
- In Sneads ferry, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.2% compared to 13.0% in Jefferson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sneads ferry at 17.9%, compared to 13.9% in Jefferson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jefferson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.0% compared to 10.2% in Sneads ferry.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.