Demographics details for Jefferson, OR vs Fort calhoun, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jefferson, OR vs Fort calhoun, NE.
| Data | Jefferson | Fort calhoun |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,304 | 1,115 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 44.1 years |
| Median Income | $87,604 | $75,900 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Jefferson vs Fort calhoun
- In Jefferson, the population is higher at 3,304, compared to 1,115 in Fort calhoun.
- The median age in Fort calhoun is higher at 44.1 years, compared to 31.7 years in Jefferson.
- Jefferson has a higher median income of $87,604 compared to $75,900 in Fort calhoun.
- In Fort calhoun, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 39.0% in Jefferson.
- Jefferson has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Fort calhoun.
- The unemployment rate in Jefferson is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.5% in Fort calhoun.
Demographics
Demographics Jefferson vs Fort calhoun provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jefferson | Fort calhoun |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 67 | 85 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 20 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jefferson vs Fort calhoun
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jefferson at 2% compared to 1% in Fort calhoun.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort calhoun at 85% compared to 67% in Jefferson.
- Both Jefferson and Fort calhoun have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jefferson at 20% compared to 6% in Fort calhoun.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jefferson at 10% compared to 8% in Fort calhoun.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Jefferson at 1% compared to 0% in Fort calhoun.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jefferson | Fort calhoun |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 12.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 7.7% |
| Depression | 28.9% | 15.3% |
| Smoking | 16.5% | 14.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 22.1% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 33.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jefferson vs Fort calhoun
- More residents in Jefferson report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 12.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jefferson at 28.9% compared to 15.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jefferson at 16.5% compared to 14.0% in Fort calhoun.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort calhoun at 22.1% compared to 16.4% in Jefferson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jefferson at 36.5% compared to 33.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jefferson at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort calhoun.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jefferson | Fort calhoun |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (78) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.0% (430) | 33.7% (376) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (458) | 6.5% (72) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (363) | 14.4% (161) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jefferson vs Fort calhoun
- A higher percentage of residents in Jefferson have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Fort calhoun.
- In Fort calhoun, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.7% compared to 13.0% in Jefferson.
- More residents in Jefferson have less than a high school education at 13.9% compared to 6.5% in Fort calhoun.
- In Fort calhoun, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 11.0% in Jefferson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.