Demographics details for Jefferson, OR vs Anchorage, AK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jefferson, OR vs Anchorage, AK.
| Data | Jefferson | Anchorage |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,304 | 287,145 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 34.5 years |
| Median Income | $87,604 | $95,731 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Jefferson vs Anchorage
- The population in Anchorage is higher at 287,145, compared to 3,304 in Jefferson.
- The median age in Anchorage is higher at 34.5 years, compared to 31.7 years in Jefferson.
- Anchorage has a higher median income of $95,731, compared to $87,604 in Jefferson.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Jefferson and Anchorage at 39.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Anchorage at 11%, compared to 10% in Jefferson.
- Anchorage has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Jefferson.
Demographics
Demographics Jefferson vs Anchorage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jefferson | Anchorage |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 5 |
| White | 67 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 10 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 7 |
Demographics Comparison: Jefferson vs Anchorage
- In Anchorage, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 2% in Jefferson.
- Jefferson has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 55% in Anchorage.
- In Anchorage, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 0% in Jefferson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jefferson at 20% compared to 10% in Anchorage.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Anchorage at 13%, compared to 10% in Jefferson.
- In Anchorage, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 7%, compared to 1% in Jefferson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jefferson | Anchorage |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 28.9% | 19.5% |
| Smoking | 16.5% | 14.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jefferson vs Anchorage
- More residents in Jefferson report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 14.5% in Anchorage.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jefferson at 28.9% compared to 19.5% in Anchorage.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jefferson at 16.5% compared to 14.9% in Anchorage.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Anchorage at 17.8% compared to 16.4% in Jefferson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jefferson at 36.5% compared to 32.9% in Anchorage.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jefferson at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Anchorage.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jefferson | Anchorage |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (78) | 0.7% (1,971) |
| High School Diploma | 13.0% (430) | 13.5% (38,782) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (458) | 5.8% (16,779) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (363) | 24.8% (71,274) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jefferson vs Anchorage
- A higher percentage of residents in Jefferson have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.7% in Anchorage.
- In Anchorage, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.5% compared to 13.0% in Jefferson.
- More residents in Jefferson have less than a high school education at 13.9% compared to 5.8% in Anchorage.
- In Anchorage, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.8% compared to 11.0% in Jefferson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.