Demographics details for Jefferson, MD vs Fresno, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jefferson, MD vs Fresno, TX.
| Data | Jefferson | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,742 | 23,608 |
| Median Age | 41.4 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $137,667 | $88,448 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Jefferson vs Fresno
- The population in Fresno is higher at 23,608, compared to 2,742 in Jefferson.
- Residents in Jefferson have a higher median age of 41.4 years compared to 37.1 years in Fresno.
- Jefferson has a higher median income of $137,667 compared to $88,448 in Fresno.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jefferson at 51.0% compared to 35.0% in Fresno.
- The poverty level is higher in Fresno at 8%, compared to 0% in Jefferson.
- Fresno has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Jefferson.
Demographics
Demographics Jefferson vs Fresno provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jefferson | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 55 |
| White | 82 | Data is updating |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jefferson vs Fresno
- In Fresno, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 55% compared to 6% in Jefferson.
- Jefferson has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 0% in Fresno.
- The Asian population is larger in Jefferson at 3% compared to 1% in Fresno.
- Fresno has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 5% in Jefferson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fresno at 10%, compared to 4% in Jefferson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jefferson and Fresno at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jefferson | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 18.3% |
| Smoking | 12.6% | 16.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 32.1% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jefferson vs Fresno
- In Fresno, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 14.8% in Jefferson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jefferson at 20.4% compared to 18.3% in Fresno.
- Fresno has a higher smoking rate at 16.3% compared to 12.6% in Jefferson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jefferson at 17.8% compared to 14.5% in Fresno.
- Fresno has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 32.1% in Jefferson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jefferson at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in Fresno.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jefferson | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (10) | 2.0% (470) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (516) | 21.1% (4,980) |
| Less than High School | 2.3% (62) | 16.8% (3,975) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.4% (751) | 16.9% (3,981) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jefferson vs Fresno
- In Fresno, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.4% in Jefferson.
- In Fresno, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.1% compared to 18.8% in Jefferson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fresno at 16.8%, compared to 2.3% in Jefferson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jefferson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.4% compared to 16.9% in Fresno.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.