Demographics details for Jefferson city, MO vs Winters, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Jefferson city, MO vs Winters, TX.

Data Jefferson city Winters
Population 42,528 2,330
Median Age 38.5 years 33.9 years
Median Income $63,649 $44,426
Married Families 37.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 11% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.9 5.0

Population Comparison: Jefferson city vs Winters

  • In Jefferson city, the population is higher at 42,528, compared to 2,330 in Winters.
  • Residents in Jefferson city have a higher median age of 38.5 years compared to 33.9 years in Winters.
  • Jefferson city has a higher median income of $63,649 compared to $44,426 in Winters.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Jefferson city at 37.0% compared to 36.0% in Winters.
  • The poverty level is higher in Winters at 13%, compared to 11% in Jefferson city.
  • Winters has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.9% in Jefferson city.

Demographics

Demographics Jefferson city vs Winters provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Jefferson city Winters
Black 18 1
White 72 36
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 3 48
Two or More Races 4 15
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Jefferson city vs Winters

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jefferson city at 18% compared to 1% in Winters.
  • Jefferson city has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 36% in Winters.
  • The Asian population is larger in Jefferson city at 3% compared to 0% in Winters.
  • Winters has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 48%, compared to 3% in Jefferson city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Winters at 15%, compared to 4% in Jefferson city.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jefferson city and Winters at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Jefferson city Winters
Mental Health Not Good 17.1% 20.5%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% 16.3%
Depression 22.6% 25.7%
Smoking 18.6% 23.5%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 16.3%
Obesity 37.4% 41.7%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Jefferson city vs Winters

  • In Winters, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 17.1% in Jefferson city.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Winters at 25.7% versus 22.6% in Jefferson city.
  • Winters has a higher smoking rate at 23.5% compared to 18.6% in Jefferson city.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Jefferson city at 16.9% compared to 16.3% in Winters.
  • Winters has higher obesity rates at 41.7% compared to 37.4% in Jefferson city.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Winters at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Jefferson city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Jefferson city Winters
No Schooling 0.5% (233) 1.5% (35)
High School Diploma 15.9% (6,767) 20.8% (484)
Less than High School 11.0% (4,659) 35.9% (836)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 24.8% (10,543) 6.8% (158)

Education Levels Comparison: Jefferson city vs Winters

  • In Winters, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.5% in Jefferson city.
  • In Winters, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 15.9% in Jefferson city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Winters at 35.9%, compared to 11.0% in Jefferson city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Jefferson city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.8% compared to 6.8% in Winters.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.