Demographics details for Jefferson city, MO vs Mukilteo, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Jefferson city, MO vs Mukilteo, WA.

Data Jefferson city Mukilteo
Population 42,528 21,096
Median Age 38.5 years 43.6 years
Median Income $63,649 $123,036
Married Families 37.0% 48.0%
Poverty Level 11% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.9 3.2

Population Comparison: Jefferson city vs Mukilteo

  • In Jefferson city, the population is higher at 42,528, compared to 21,096 in Mukilteo.
  • The median age in Mukilteo is higher at 43.6 years, compared to 38.5 years in Jefferson city.
  • Mukilteo has a higher median income of $123,036, compared to $63,649 in Jefferson city.
  • In Mukilteo, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 37.0% in Jefferson city.
  • Jefferson city has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Mukilteo.
  • The unemployment rate in Jefferson city is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.2% in Mukilteo.

Demographics

Demographics Jefferson city vs Mukilteo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Jefferson city Mukilteo
Black 18 1
White 72 61
Asian 3 21
Hispanic 3 6
Two or More Races 4 11
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Jefferson city vs Mukilteo

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jefferson city at 18% compared to 1% in Mukilteo.
  • Jefferson city has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 61% in Mukilteo.
  • In Mukilteo, the Asian population stands at 21%, greater than 3% in Jefferson city.
  • Mukilteo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Jefferson city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mukilteo at 11%, compared to 4% in Jefferson city.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jefferson city and Mukilteo at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Jefferson city Mukilteo
Mental Health Not Good 17.1% 14.6%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% 8.9%
Depression 22.6% 26.5%
Smoking 18.6% 9.3%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 15.7%
Obesity 37.4% 29.2%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Jefferson city vs Mukilteo

  • More residents in Jefferson city report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.6% in Mukilteo.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mukilteo at 26.5% versus 22.6% in Jefferson city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Jefferson city at 18.6% compared to 9.3% in Mukilteo.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Jefferson city at 16.9% compared to 15.7% in Mukilteo.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Jefferson city at 37.4% compared to 29.2% in Mukilteo.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Jefferson city at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Mukilteo.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Jefferson city Mukilteo
No Schooling 0.5% (233) 0.1% (24)
High School Diploma 15.9% (6,767) 9.7% (2,042)
Less than High School 11.0% (4,659) 2.0% (414)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 24.8% (10,543) 38.3% (8,089)

Education Levels Comparison: Jefferson city vs Mukilteo

  • A higher percentage of residents in Jefferson city have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.1% in Mukilteo.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Jefferson city hold a high school diploma at 15.9% compared to 9.7% in Mukilteo.
  • More residents in Jefferson city have less than a high school education at 11.0% compared to 2.0% in Mukilteo.
  • In Mukilteo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.3% compared to 24.8% in Jefferson city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.