Demographics details for Jefferson city, MO vs Ladson, SC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Jefferson city, MO vs Ladson, SC.

Data Jefferson city Ladson
Population 42,528 15,298
Median Age 38.5 years 34.7 years
Median Income $63,649 $74,020
Married Families 37.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 11% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.9 3.5

Population Comparison: Jefferson city vs Ladson

  • In Jefferson city, the population is higher at 42,528, compared to 15,298 in Ladson.
  • Residents in Jefferson city have a higher median age of 38.5 years compared to 34.7 years in Ladson.
  • Ladson has a higher median income of $74,020, compared to $63,649 in Jefferson city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Jefferson city at 37.0% compared to 32.0% in Ladson.
  • Jefferson city has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Ladson.
  • The unemployment rate in Jefferson city is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.5% in Ladson.

Demographics

Demographics Jefferson city vs Ladson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Jefferson city Ladson
Black 18 29
White 72 49
Asian 3 4
Hispanic 3 9
Two or More Races 4 8
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Jefferson city vs Ladson

  • In Ladson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 18% in Jefferson city.
  • Jefferson city has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 49% in Ladson.
  • In Ladson, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Jefferson city.
  • Ladson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 3% in Jefferson city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ladson at 8%, compared to 4% in Jefferson city.
  • In Ladson, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Jefferson city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Jefferson city Ladson
Mental Health Not Good 17.1% 17.4%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% 11.5%
Depression 22.6% 19.4%
Smoking 18.6% 17.1%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 19.4%
Obesity 37.4% 38.5%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Jefferson city vs Ladson

  • In Ladson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 17.1% in Jefferson city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Jefferson city at 22.6% compared to 19.4% in Ladson.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Jefferson city at 18.6% compared to 17.1% in Ladson.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Ladson at 19.4% compared to 16.9% in Jefferson city.
  • Ladson has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 37.4% in Jefferson city.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ladson at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Jefferson city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Jefferson city Ladson
No Schooling 0.5% (233) 0.7% (105)
High School Diploma 15.9% (6,767) 14.0% (2,141)
Less than High School 11.0% (4,659) 13.9% (2,130)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 24.8% (10,543) 13.5% (2,065)

Education Levels Comparison: Jefferson city vs Ladson

  • In Ladson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Jefferson city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Jefferson city hold a high school diploma at 15.9% compared to 14.0% in Ladson.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ladson at 13.9%, compared to 11.0% in Jefferson city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Jefferson city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.8% compared to 13.5% in Ladson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.