Demographics details for Jefferson city, MO vs Gilford, NH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Jefferson city, MO vs Gilford, NH.

Data Jefferson city Gilford
Population 42,528 7,194
Median Age 38.5 years 47.5 years
Median Income $63,649 $75,964
Married Families 37.0% 0.6%
Poverty Level 11% 6%
Unemployment Rate 3.9 2.2

Population Comparison: Jefferson city vs Gilford

  • In Jefferson city, the population is higher at 42,528, compared to 7,194 in Gilford.
  • The median age in Gilford is higher at 47.5 years, compared to 38.5 years in Jefferson city.
  • Gilford has a higher median income of $75,964, compared to $63,649 in Jefferson city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Jefferson city at 37.0% compared to 0.6% in Gilford.
  • Jefferson city has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 6% in Gilford.
  • The unemployment rate in Jefferson city is higher at 3.9%, compared to 2.2% in Gilford.

Demographics

Demographics Jefferson city vs Gilford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Jefferson city Gilford
Black 18 0.5
White 72 96.2
Asian 3 0.7
Hispanic 3 1.6
Two or More Races 4 1.0
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Jefferson city vs Gilford

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jefferson city at 18% compared to 0.5% in Gilford.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Gilford at 96.2% compared to 72% in Jefferson city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Jefferson city at 3% compared to 0.7% in Gilford.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Jefferson city at 3% compared to 1.6% in Gilford.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Jefferson city at 4% compared to 1.0% in Gilford.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jefferson city and Gilford at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Jefferson city Gilford
Mental Health Not Good 17.1% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% Data is updating%
Depression 22.6% Data is updating%
Smoking 18.6% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.9% Data is updating%
Obesity 37.4% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 11.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Jefferson city vs Gilford

  • More residents in Jefferson city report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Jefferson city at 22.6% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Jefferson city at 18.6% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Jefferson city at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Jefferson city at 37.4% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Jefferson city at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Jefferson city Gilford
No Schooling 0.5% (233) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 15.9% (6,767) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 11.0% (4,659) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 24.8% (10,543) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Jefferson city vs Gilford

  • A higher percentage of residents in Jefferson city have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Jefferson city hold a high school diploma at 15.9% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
  • More residents in Jefferson city have less than a high school education at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Jefferson city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.8% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.