Demographics details for Jay, OK vs El campo, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jay, OK vs El campo, TX.
| Data | Jay | El campo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,452 | 12,179 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $36,625 | $62,667 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Jay vs El campo
- The population in El campo is higher at 12,179, compared to 2,452 in Jay.
- The median age in El campo is higher at 35.9 years, compared to 35.4 years in Jay.
- El campo has a higher median income of $62,667, compared to $36,625 in Jay.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Jay and El campo at 39.0%.
- Jay has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 11% in El campo.
- El campo has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.2% in Jay.
Demographics
Demographics Jay vs El campo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jay | El campo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 9 |
| White | 26 | 29 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 52 |
| Two or More Races | 23 | 10 |
| American Indian | 42 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jay vs El campo
- In El campo, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Jay.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in El campo at 29% compared to 26% in Jay.
- The Asian population is larger in Jay at 1% compared to 0% in El campo.
- El campo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 52%, compared to 8% in Jay.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jay at 23% compared to 10% in El campo.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Jay at 42% compared to 0% in El campo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jay | El campo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.4% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.1% | 14.2% |
| Depression | 26.7% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 28.9% | 19.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 43.4% | 40.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jay vs El campo
- More residents in Jay report poor mental health at 22.4% compared to 18.5% in El campo.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jay at 26.7% compared to 23.3% in El campo.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jay at 28.9% compared to 19.0% in El campo.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in El campo at 16.9% compared to 14.0% in Jay.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jay at 43.4% compared to 40.1% in El campo.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jay at 27.0% compared to 16.0% in El campo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jay | El campo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.1% (76) | 2.3% (277) |
| High School Diploma | 23.5% (577) | 14.5% (1,760) |
| Less than High School | 27.9% (685) | 28.8% (3,510) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.6% (186) | 10.2% (1,240) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jay vs El campo
- A higher percentage of residents in Jay have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 2.3% in El campo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jay hold a high school diploma at 23.5% compared to 14.5% in El campo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in El campo at 28.8%, compared to 27.9% in Jay.
- In El campo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.2% compared to 7.6% in Jay.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.