Demographics details for Jasper, TX vs Seaside park, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jasper, TX vs Seaside park, NJ.
Data | Jasper | Seaside park |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,423 | 1,473 |
Median Age | 37.6 years | 59.5 years |
Median Income | $38,796 | $80,658 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 57.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Jasper vs Seaside park
- In Jasper, the population is higher at 7,423, compared to 1,473 in Seaside park.
- The median age in Seaside park is higher at 59.5 years, compared to 37.6 years in Jasper.
- Seaside park has a higher median income of $80,658, compared to $38,796 in Jasper.
- In Seaside park, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 28.0% in Jasper.
- Jasper has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 5% in Seaside park.
- The unemployment rate in Jasper is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.1% in Seaside park.
Demographics
Demographics Jasper vs Seaside park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Jasper | Seaside park |
---|---|---|
Black | 41 | 3 |
White | 46 | 90 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | 8 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jasper vs Seaside park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jasper at 41% compared to 3% in Seaside park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Seaside park at 90% compared to 46% in Jasper.
- In Seaside park, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Jasper.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jasper at 8% compared to 1% in Seaside park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jasper at 5% compared to 2% in Seaside park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jasper and Seaside park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Jasper | Seaside park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 15.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 10.1% |
Depression | 23.4% | 23.1% |
Smoking | 23.1% | 13.2% |
Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 42.6% | 30.7% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jasper vs Seaside park
- More residents in Jasper report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 15.4% in Seaside park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jasper at 23.4% compared to 23.1% in Seaside park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jasper at 23.1% compared to 13.2% in Seaside park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Seaside park at 18.2% compared to 15.5% in Jasper.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jasper at 42.6% compared to 30.7% in Seaside park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jasper at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Seaside park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Jasper | Seaside park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (14) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 26.8% (1,987) | 22.2% (327) |
Less than High School | 8.8% (653) | 3.3% (49) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (591) | 56.3% (830) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jasper vs Seaside park
- A higher percentage of residents in Jasper have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Seaside park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jasper hold a high school diploma at 26.8% compared to 22.2% in Seaside park.
- More residents in Jasper have less than a high school education at 8.8% compared to 3.3% in Seaside park.
- In Seaside park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 56.3% compared to 8.0% in Jasper.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.