Demographics details for Jasper, TX vs Lexington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jasper, TX vs Lexington, NC.
Data | Jasper | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,423 | 19,679 |
Median Age | 37.6 years | 38.6 years |
Median Income | $38,796 | $36,868 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Jasper vs Lexington
- The population in Lexington is higher at 19,679, compared to 7,423 in Jasper.
- The median age in Lexington is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 37.6 years in Jasper.
- Jasper has a higher median income of $38,796 compared to $36,868 in Lexington.
- In Lexington, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 28.0% in Jasper.
- Jasper has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 15% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Jasper.
Demographics
Demographics Jasper vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Jasper | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Black | 41 | 31 |
White | 46 | 38 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | 8 | 16 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jasper vs Lexington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jasper at 41% compared to 31% in Lexington.
- Jasper has a higher percentage of White residents at 46% compared to 38% in Lexington.
- In Lexington, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Jasper.
- Lexington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 8% in Jasper.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 11%, compared to 5% in Jasper.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jasper and Lexington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Jasper | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 15.5% |
Depression | 23.4% | 25.0% |
Smoking | 23.1% | 24.1% |
Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 13.8% |
Obesity | 42.6% | 42.7% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jasper vs Lexington
- More residents in Jasper report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 19.2% in Lexington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lexington at 25.0% versus 23.4% in Jasper.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 23.1% in Jasper.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jasper at 15.5% compared to 13.8% in Lexington.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 42.6% in Jasper.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lexington at 18.0% compared to 17.0% in Jasper.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Jasper | Lexington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (14) | 2.7% (531) |
High School Diploma | 26.8% (1,987) | 17.0% (3,355) |
Less than High School | 8.8% (653) | 25.6% (5,036) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (591) | 10.2% (2,009) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jasper vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.2% in Jasper.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jasper hold a high school diploma at 26.8% compared to 17.0% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 25.6%, compared to 8.8% in Jasper.
- In Lexington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.2% compared to 8.0% in Jasper.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.