Demographics details for Jasper, GA vs Mount union, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jasper, GA vs Mount union, PA.
Data | Jasper | Mount union |
---|---|---|
Population | 15,951 | 2,267 |
Median Age | 42.2 years | 34.8 years |
Median Income | $57,374 | $38,382 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Jasper vs Mount union
- In Jasper, the population is higher at 15,951, compared to 2,267 in Mount union.
- Residents in Jasper have a higher median age of 42.2 years compared to 34.8 years in Mount union.
- Jasper has a higher median income of $57,374 compared to $38,382 in Mount union.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jasper at 40.0% compared to 25.0% in Mount union.
- The poverty level is identical in both Jasper and Mount union at 12%.
- Mount union has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.6% in Jasper.
Demographics
Demographics Jasper vs Mount union provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Jasper | Mount union |
---|---|---|
Black | 17 | 8 |
White | 76 | 87 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jasper vs Mount union
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jasper at 17% compared to 8% in Mount union.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mount union at 87% compared to 76% in Jasper.
- Both Jasper and Mount union have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jasper at 4% compared to 1% in Mount union.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mount union at 4%, compared to 3% in Jasper.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jasper and Mount union at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Jasper | Mount union |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 20.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 15.3% |
Depression | 22.4% | 25.6% |
Smoking | 19.8% | 26.4% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 16.4% |
Obesity | 38.5% | 43.0% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jasper vs Mount union
- In Mount union, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 17.9% in Jasper.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mount union at 25.6% versus 22.4% in Jasper.
- Mount union has a higher smoking rate at 26.4% compared to 19.8% in Jasper.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mount union at 16.4% compared to 15.8% in Jasper.
- Mount union has higher obesity rates at 43.0% compared to 38.5% in Jasper.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mount union at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Jasper.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Jasper | Mount union |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (120) | 1.9% (43) |
High School Diploma | 23.8% (3,793) | 28.5% (646) |
Less than High School | 11.3% (1,800) | 16.3% (370) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.8% (1,876) | 6.3% (142) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jasper vs Mount union
- In Mount union, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.8% in Jasper.
- In Mount union, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.5% compared to 23.8% in Jasper.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mount union at 16.3%, compared to 11.3% in Jasper.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jasper hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.8% compared to 6.3% in Mount union.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.