Demographics details for Jasper, GA vs Livermore, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jasper, GA vs Livermore, CA.
| Data | Jasper | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,951 | 84,701 |
| Median Age | 42.2 years | 40.3 years |
| Median Income | $57,374 | $152,590 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Jasper vs Livermore
- The population in Livermore is higher at 84,701, compared to 15,951 in Jasper.
- Residents in Jasper have a higher median age of 42.2 years compared to 40.3 years in Livermore.
- Livermore has a higher median income of $152,590, compared to $57,374 in Jasper.
- In Livermore, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 40.0% in Jasper.
- Jasper has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Livermore.
- Livermore has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.6% in Jasper.
Demographics
Demographics Jasper vs Livermore provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jasper | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 2 |
| White | 76 | 44 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 17 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Jasper vs Livermore
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jasper at 17% compared to 2% in Livermore.
- Jasper has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 44% in Livermore.
- In Livermore, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 0% in Jasper.
- Livermore has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 4% in Jasper.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Livermore at 13%, compared to 3% in Jasper.
- In Livermore, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Jasper.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jasper | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 22.4% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 19.8% | 9.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 26.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jasper vs Livermore
- More residents in Jasper report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 14.9% in Livermore.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jasper at 22.4% compared to 19.6% in Livermore.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jasper at 19.8% compared to 9.4% in Livermore.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Livermore at 18.4% compared to 15.8% in Jasper.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jasper at 38.5% compared to 26.6% in Livermore.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jasper at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Livermore.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jasper | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (120) | 1.4% (1,173) |
| High School Diploma | 23.8% (3,793) | 9.5% (8,051) |
| Less than High School | 11.3% (1,800) | 7.8% (6,576) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.8% (1,876) | 35.4% (30,013) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jasper vs Livermore
- In Livermore, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.8% in Jasper.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jasper hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 9.5% in Livermore.
- More residents in Jasper have less than a high school education at 11.3% compared to 7.8% in Livermore.
- In Livermore, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 11.8% in Jasper.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.