Demographics details for Jasper, AL vs Cincinnati, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jasper, AL vs Cincinnati, OH.
Data | Jasper | Cincinnati |
---|---|---|
Population | 14,338 | 309,513 |
Median Age | 35.4 years | 32.9 years |
Median Income | $62,850 | $49,191 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 24.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 17% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Jasper vs Cincinnati
- The population in Cincinnati is higher at 309,513, compared to 14,338 in Jasper.
- Residents in Jasper have a higher median age of 35.4 years compared to 32.9 years in Cincinnati.
- Jasper has a higher median income of $62,850 compared to $49,191 in Cincinnati.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jasper at 36.0% compared to 24.0% in Cincinnati.
- The poverty level is higher in Cincinnati at 17%, compared to 15% in Jasper.
- Cincinnati has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 4.5% in Jasper.
Demographics
Demographics Jasper vs Cincinnati provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Jasper | Cincinnati |
---|---|---|
Black | 10 | 40 |
White | 81 | 46 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jasper vs Cincinnati
- In Cincinnati, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 10% in Jasper.
- Jasper has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 46% in Cincinnati.
- In Cincinnati, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Jasper.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Jasper and Cincinnati at 5%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cincinnati at 6%, compared to 4% in Jasper.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jasper and Cincinnati at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Jasper | Cincinnati |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 13.1% |
Depression | 24.0% | 21.6% |
Smoking | 19.8% | 21.3% |
Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 38.2% | 39.8% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jasper vs Cincinnati
- More residents in Jasper report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 18.0% in Cincinnati.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jasper at 24.0% compared to 21.6% in Cincinnati.
- Cincinnati has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 19.8% in Jasper.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cincinnati at 18.2% compared to 15.1% in Jasper.
- Cincinnati has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 38.2% in Jasper.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jasper at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Cincinnati.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Jasper | Cincinnati |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (69) | 0.9% (2,632) |
High School Diploma | 14.6% (2,098) | 12.5% (38,643) |
Less than High School | 12.9% (1,856) | 9.6% (29,753) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.3% (2,338) | 26.4% (81,592) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jasper vs Cincinnati
- In Cincinnati, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Jasper.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jasper hold a high school diploma at 14.6% compared to 12.5% in Cincinnati.
- More residents in Jasper have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 9.6% in Cincinnati.
- In Cincinnati, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 16.3% in Jasper.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.