Demographics details for Jasper, AL vs Central city, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jasper, AL vs Central city, NE.
| Data | Jasper | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,338 | 3,078 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $62,850 | $54,063 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Jasper vs Central city
- In Jasper, the population is higher at 14,338, compared to 3,078 in Central city.
- The median age in Central city is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 35.4 years in Jasper.
- Jasper has a higher median income of $62,850 compared to $54,063 in Central city.
- In Central city, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 36.0% in Jasper.
- Jasper has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Central city.
- The unemployment rate in Jasper is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.5% in Central city.
Demographics
Demographics Jasper vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jasper | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | Data is updating |
| White | 81 | 86 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jasper vs Central city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jasper at 10% compared to 0% in Central city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 86% compared to 81% in Jasper.
- In Central city, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Jasper.
- Central city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Jasper.
- Both Jasper and Central city have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jasper and Central city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jasper | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 18.6% |
| Smoking | 19.8% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 20.0% |
| Obesity | 38.2% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jasper vs Central city
- More residents in Jasper report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 14.5% in Central city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jasper at 24.0% compared to 18.6% in Central city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jasper at 19.8% compared to 17.5% in Central city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Central city at 20.0% compared to 15.1% in Jasper.
- Central city has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 38.2% in Jasper.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jasper at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Central city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jasper | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (69) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (2,098) | 23.4% (721) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (1,856) | 5.8% (178) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.3% (2,338) | 13.1% (404) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jasper vs Central city
- A higher percentage of residents in Jasper have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Central city.
- In Central city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.4% compared to 14.6% in Jasper.
- More residents in Jasper have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 5.8% in Central city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jasper hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 13.1% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.