Demographics details for Janesville, WI vs Cuyahoga falls, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Janesville, WI vs Cuyahoga falls, OH.

Data Janesville Cuyahoga falls
Population 65,911 50,655
Median Age 39.5 years 37.8 years
Median Income $68,610 $67,922
Married Families 38.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 9% 7%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.8

Population Comparison: Janesville vs Cuyahoga falls

  • In Janesville, the population is higher at 65,911, compared to 50,655 in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Residents in Janesville have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 37.8 years in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Janesville has a higher median income of $68,610 compared to $67,922 in Cuyahoga falls.
  • In Cuyahoga falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 38.0% in Janesville.
  • Janesville has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 7% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Cuyahoga falls has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.2% in Janesville.

Demographics

Demographics Janesville vs Cuyahoga falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Janesville Cuyahoga falls
Black 3 5
White 85 81
Asian 2 6
Hispanic 5 3
Two or More Races 5 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Janesville vs Cuyahoga falls

  • In Cuyahoga falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Janesville.
  • Janesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 81% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • In Cuyahoga falls, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 2% in Janesville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Janesville at 5% compared to 3% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Both Janesville and Cuyahoga falls have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Janesville and Cuyahoga falls at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Janesville Cuyahoga falls
Mental Health Not Good 14.8% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 10.2% 11.1%
Depression 25.1% 25.1%
Smoking 16.1% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 23.4% 18.8%
Obesity 34.1% 41.1%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Janesville vs Cuyahoga falls

  • In Cuyahoga falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.8% in Janesville.
  • Both cities have comparable depression rates at 25.1%.
  • Cuyahoga falls has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 16.1% in Janesville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Janesville at 23.4% compared to 18.8% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Cuyahoga falls has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 34.1% in Janesville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Janesville at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Cuyahoga falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Janesville Cuyahoga falls
No Schooling 0.5% (330) 1.6% (825)
High School Diploma 20.4% (13,471) 19.4% (9,813)
Less than High School 8.0% (5,276) 6.3% (3,197)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.1% (11,899) 26.1% (13,215)

Education Levels Comparison: Janesville vs Cuyahoga falls

  • In Cuyahoga falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.5% in Janesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Janesville hold a high school diploma at 20.4% compared to 19.4% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • More residents in Janesville have less than a high school education at 8.0% compared to 6.3% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • In Cuyahoga falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 18.1% in Janesville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.