Demographics details for Janesville, IA vs South jordan, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Janesville, IA vs South jordan, UT.

Data Janesville South jordan
Population 1,050 83,513
Median Age 38.1 years 34.4 years
Median Income $88,625 $119,822
Married Families 51.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 5% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.7

Population Comparison: Janesville vs South jordan

  • The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 1,050 in Janesville.
  • Residents in Janesville have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
  • South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $88,625 in Janesville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Janesville at 51.0% compared to 44.0% in South jordan.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Janesville and South jordan at 5%.
  • South jordan has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.5% in Janesville.

Demographics

Demographics Janesville vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Janesville South jordan
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 99 83
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic 1 7
Two or More Races Data is updating 5
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Janesville vs South jordan

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Janesville and South jordan at 0%.
  • Janesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 83% in South jordan.
  • In South jordan, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Janesville.
  • South jordan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 1% in Janesville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South jordan at 5%, compared to 0% in Janesville.
  • In South jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Janesville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Janesville South jordan
Mental Health Not Good 14.5% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 8.8% 9.0%
Depression 18.4% 26.5%
Smoking 15.1% 7.3%
Binge Drinking 22.5% 16.9%
Obesity 35.3% 28.6%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Janesville vs South jordan

  • In South jordan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 14.5% in Janesville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 18.4% in Janesville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Janesville at 15.1% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Janesville at 22.5% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Janesville at 35.3% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Janesville at 8.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Janesville South jordan
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.2% (172)
High School Diploma 16.6% (174) 8.4% (6,995)
Less than High School 2.7% (28) 2.7% (2,236)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.1% (190) 27.1% (22,648)

Education Levels Comparison: Janesville vs South jordan

  • In South jordan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Janesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Janesville hold a high school diploma at 16.6% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
  • Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 2.7%.
  • In South jordan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 18.1% in Janesville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.