Demographics details for Janesville, IA vs San francisco, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Janesville, IA vs San francisco, CA.

Data Janesville San francisco
Population 1,050 808,437
Median Age 38.1 years 39.3 years
Median Income $88,625 $136,689
Married Families 51.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 5% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.6

Population Comparison: Janesville vs San francisco

  • The population in San francisco is higher at 808,437, compared to 1,050 in Janesville.
  • The median age in San francisco is higher at 39.3 years, compared to 38.1 years in Janesville.
  • San francisco has a higher median income of $136,689, compared to $88,625 in Janesville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Janesville at 51.0% compared to 38.0% in San francisco.
  • The poverty level is higher in San francisco at 12%, compared to 5% in Janesville.
  • San francisco has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Janesville.

Demographics

Demographics Janesville vs San francisco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Janesville San francisco
Black Data is updating 5
White 99 31
Asian Data is updating 37
Hispanic 1 16
Two or More Races Data is updating 10
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Janesville vs San francisco

  • In San francisco, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Janesville.
  • Janesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 31% in San francisco.
  • In San francisco, the Asian population stands at 37%, greater than 0% in Janesville.
  • San francisco has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 1% in Janesville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San francisco at 10%, compared to 0% in Janesville.
  • In San francisco, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Janesville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Janesville San francisco
Mental Health Not Good 14.5% 13.4%
Physical Health Not Good 8.8% 8.4%
Depression 18.4% 15.7%
Smoking 15.1% 9.2%
Binge Drinking 22.5% 16.4%
Obesity 35.3% 19.1%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Janesville vs San francisco

  • More residents in Janesville report poor mental health at 14.5% compared to 13.4% in San francisco.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Janesville at 18.4% compared to 15.7% in San francisco.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Janesville at 15.1% compared to 9.2% in San francisco.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Janesville at 22.5% compared to 16.4% in San francisco.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Janesville at 35.3% compared to 19.1% in San francisco.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in San francisco at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Janesville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Janesville San francisco
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 3.0% (23,928)
High School Diploma 16.6% (174) 8.5% (68,418)
Less than High School 2.7% (28) 12.4% (99,947)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.1% (190) 50.3% (406,774)

Education Levels Comparison: Janesville vs San francisco

  • In San francisco, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.0% in Janesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Janesville hold a high school diploma at 16.6% compared to 8.5% in San francisco.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San francisco at 12.4%, compared to 2.7% in Janesville.
  • In San francisco, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.3% compared to 18.1% in Janesville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.