Demographics details for Janesville, IA vs Auburn, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Janesville, IA vs Auburn, AL.
| Data | Janesville | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,050 | 80,006 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 25.9 years |
| Median Income | $88,625 | $55,509 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Janesville vs Auburn
- The population in Auburn is higher at 80,006, compared to 1,050 in Janesville.
- Residents in Janesville have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 25.9 years in Auburn.
- Janesville has a higher median income of $88,625 compared to $55,509 in Auburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Janesville at 51.0% compared to 32.0% in Auburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Auburn at 10%, compared to 5% in Janesville.
- The unemployment rate in Janesville is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.0% in Auburn.
Demographics
Demographics Janesville vs Auburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Janesville | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 17 |
| White | 99 | 69 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 8 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Janesville vs Auburn
- In Auburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 0% in Janesville.
- Janesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 69% in Auburn.
- In Auburn, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Janesville.
- Auburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Janesville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Auburn at 3%, compared to 0% in Janesville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Janesville and Auburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Janesville | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 18.4% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 15.1% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.5% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 35.3% | 38.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Janesville vs Auburn
- In Auburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.5% in Janesville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Auburn at 22.0% versus 18.4% in Janesville.
- Auburn has a higher smoking rate at 15.5% compared to 15.1% in Janesville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Janesville at 22.5% compared to 14.5% in Auburn.
- Auburn has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 35.3% in Janesville.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Janesville and Auburn at 8.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Janesville | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (236) |
| High School Diploma | 16.6% (174) | 5.3% (4,206) |
| Less than High School | 2.7% (28) | 2.5% (1,964) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.1% (190) | 30.7% (24,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Janesville vs Auburn
- In Auburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Janesville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Janesville hold a high school diploma at 16.6% compared to 5.3% in Auburn.
- More residents in Janesville have less than a high school education at 2.7% compared to 2.5% in Auburn.
- In Auburn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.7% compared to 18.1% in Janesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.