Demographics details for Jacksonville, FL vs Provo, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jacksonville, FL vs Provo, UT.
| Data | Jacksonville | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 971,319 | 113,523 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 23.6 years |
| Median Income | $64,138 | $57,943 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Jacksonville vs Provo
- In Jacksonville, the population is higher at 971,319, compared to 113,523 in Provo.
- Residents in Jacksonville have a higher median age of 36.3 years compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- Jacksonville has a higher median income of $64,138 compared to $57,943 in Provo.
- In Provo, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 34.0% in Jacksonville.
- The poverty level is higher in Provo at 11%, compared to 0% in Jacksonville.
- Provo has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.8% in Jacksonville.
Demographics
Demographics Jacksonville vs Provo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jacksonville | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 30 | 1 |
| White | 46 | 69 |
| Asian | 5 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Jacksonville vs Provo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jacksonville at 30% compared to 1% in Provo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Provo at 69% compared to 46% in Jacksonville.
- The Asian population is larger in Jacksonville at 5% compared to 2% in Provo.
- Provo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 11% in Jacksonville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Provo at 9%, compared to 8% in Jacksonville.
- In Provo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Jacksonville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jacksonville | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 8.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 7.3% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jacksonville vs Provo
- More residents in Jacksonville report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 16.3% in Provo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Provo at 24.5% versus 19.3% in Jacksonville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jacksonville at 20.0% compared to 8.4% in Provo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jacksonville at 16.3% compared to 7.3% in Provo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jacksonville at 35.2% compared to 33.5% in Provo.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jacksonville at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Provo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jacksonville | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (9,593) | 0.6% (663) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (157,705) | 4.6% (5,209) |
| Less than High School | 9.9% (95,724) | 5.7% (6,435) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.7% (200,864) | 18.3% (20,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jacksonville vs Provo
- A higher percentage of residents in Jacksonville have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in Provo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jacksonville hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 4.6% in Provo.
- More residents in Jacksonville have less than a high school education at 9.9% compared to 5.7% in Provo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jacksonville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 18.3% in Provo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.