Demographics details for Jacksonville, FL vs Belmont, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jacksonville, FL vs Belmont, CA.
Data | Jacksonville | Belmont |
---|---|---|
Population | 971,319 | 26,773 |
Median Age | 36.3 years | 40.9 years |
Median Income | $64,138 | $185,944 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 50.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 2% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Jacksonville vs Belmont
- In Jacksonville, the population is higher at 971,319, compared to 26,773 in Belmont.
- The median age in Belmont is higher at 40.9 years, compared to 36.3 years in Jacksonville.
- Belmont has a higher median income of $185,944, compared to $64,138 in Jacksonville.
- In Belmont, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 34.0% in Jacksonville.
- The poverty level is higher in Belmont at 2%, compared to 0% in Jacksonville.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Jacksonville and Belmont at 3.8%.
Demographics
Demographics Jacksonville vs Belmont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Jacksonville | Belmont |
---|---|---|
Black | 30 | 2 |
White | 46 | 45 |
Asian | 5 | 30 |
Hispanic | 11 | 14 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jacksonville vs Belmont
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jacksonville at 30% compared to 2% in Belmont.
- Jacksonville has a higher percentage of White residents at 46% compared to 45% in Belmont.
- In Belmont, the Asian population stands at 30%, greater than 5% in Jacksonville.
- Belmont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 11% in Jacksonville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Belmont at 9%, compared to 8% in Jacksonville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jacksonville and Belmont at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Jacksonville | Belmont |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 12.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 7.1% |
Depression | 19.3% | 15.5% |
Smoking | 20.0% | 7.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 35.2% | 20.5% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jacksonville vs Belmont
- More residents in Jacksonville report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 12.2% in Belmont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jacksonville at 19.3% compared to 15.5% in Belmont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jacksonville at 20.0% compared to 7.1% in Belmont.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Belmont at 17.0% compared to 16.3% in Jacksonville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jacksonville at 35.2% compared to 20.5% in Belmont.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jacksonville at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Belmont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Jacksonville | Belmont |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (9,593) | 0.9% (234) |
High School Diploma | 16.2% (157,705) | 6.0% (1,604) |
Less than High School | 9.9% (95,724) | 5.2% (1,394) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.7% (200,864) | 51.4% (13,763) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jacksonville vs Belmont
- A higher percentage of residents in Jacksonville have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.9% in Belmont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jacksonville hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 6.0% in Belmont.
- More residents in Jacksonville have less than a high school education at 9.9% compared to 5.2% in Belmont.
- In Belmont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 20.7% in Jacksonville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.