Demographics details for Jackson, MO vs Hickman, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jackson, MO vs Hickman, KY.
| Data | Jackson | Hickman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,702 | 4,422 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 46.6 years |
| Median Income | $72,500 | $68,589 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Jackson vs Hickman
- In Jackson, the population is higher at 15,702, compared to 4,422 in Hickman.
- The median age in Hickman is higher at 46.6 years, compared to 35.0 years in Jackson.
- Jackson has a higher median income of $72,500 compared to $68,589 in Hickman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jackson at 44.0% compared to 41.0% in Hickman.
- The poverty level is higher in Hickman at 12%, compared to 8% in Jackson.
- Hickman has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 3.5% in Jackson.
Demographics
Demographics Jackson vs Hickman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jackson | Hickman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 10 |
| White | 89 | 85 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jackson vs Hickman
- In Hickman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 2% in Jackson.
- Jackson has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 85% in Hickman.
- The Asian population is larger in Jackson at 1% compared to 0% in Hickman.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jackson at 3% compared to 2% in Hickman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jackson at 5% compared to 3% in Hickman.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jackson and Hickman at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jackson | Hickman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 27.9% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 23.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 36.2% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jackson vs Hickman
- In Hickman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 16.9% in Jackson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hickman at 27.9% versus 25.5% in Jackson.
- Hickman has a higher smoking rate at 23.5% compared to 17.9% in Jackson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jackson at 19.1% compared to 14.4% in Hickman.
- Hickman has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 36.2% in Jackson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hickman at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Jackson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jackson | Hickman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (72) | 0.2% (11) |
| High School Diploma | 15.4% (2,423) | 23.3% (1,029) |
| Less than High School | 7.8% (1,231) | 15.5% (685) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (3,742) | 16.5% (728) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jackson vs Hickman
- A higher percentage of residents in Jackson have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in Hickman.
- In Hickman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.3% compared to 15.4% in Jackson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hickman at 15.5%, compared to 7.8% in Jackson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jackson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 16.5% in Hickman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.