Demographics details for Jackson, MO vs Fremont, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jackson, MO vs Fremont, OH.
| Data | Jackson | Fremont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,702 | 15,825 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $72,500 | $48,252 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Jackson vs Fremont
- The population in Fremont is higher at 15,825, compared to 15,702 in Jackson.
- The median age in Fremont is higher at 35.7 years, compared to 35.0 years in Jackson.
- Jackson has a higher median income of $72,500 compared to $48,252 in Fremont.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jackson at 44.0% compared to 30.0% in Fremont.
- The poverty level is higher in Fremont at 14%, compared to 8% in Jackson.
- Fremont has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Jackson.
Demographics
Demographics Jackson vs Fremont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jackson | Fremont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 9 |
| White | 89 | 68 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jackson vs Fremont
- In Fremont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 2% in Jackson.
- Jackson has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 68% in Fremont.
- The Asian population is larger in Jackson at 1% compared to 0% in Fremont.
- Fremont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 3% in Jackson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fremont at 8%, compared to 5% in Jackson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jackson and Fremont at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jackson | Fremont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 36.2% | 44.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jackson vs Fremont
- In Fremont, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.9% in Jackson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jackson at 25.5% compared to 22.5% in Fremont.
- Fremont has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 17.9% in Jackson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jackson at 19.1% compared to 17.4% in Fremont.
- Fremont has higher obesity rates at 44.3% compared to 36.2% in Jackson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fremont at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Jackson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jackson | Fremont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (72) | 0.4% (57) |
| High School Diploma | 15.4% (2,423) | 24.8% (3,931) |
| Less than High School | 7.8% (1,231) | 10.0% (1,586) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (3,742) | 10.4% (1,641) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jackson vs Fremont
- A higher percentage of residents in Jackson have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Fremont.
- In Fremont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.8% compared to 15.4% in Jackson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fremont at 10.0%, compared to 7.8% in Jackson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jackson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 10.4% in Fremont.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.