Environment details: Jackson MO
Poor quality; unfit for drinking.
Environment details: Clarks hill SC
Water quality affected by urban runoff.
Compare Environment: Jackson MO vs Clarks hill SC
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Jackson | Clarks hill |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 936 | 555 |
| Water Quality | 3/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Poor quality; unfit for drinking. | Water quality affected by urban runoff. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.68 | 1.61 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 34 | 32 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Jackson vs Clarks hill
- The water quality in Clarks hill is superior at 4/10 compared to 3/10 in Jackson.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Jackson with 1.68 compared to 1.61 in Clarks hill.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Jackson at 34 compared to 32 in Clarks hill.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.