Demographics details for Jackson, MO vs Augusta, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jackson, MO vs Augusta, GA.
Data | Jackson | Augusta |
---|---|---|
Population | 15,702 | 202,096 |
Median Age | 35.0 years | 34.6 years |
Median Income | $72,500 | $50,492 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Jackson vs Augusta
- The population in Augusta is higher at 202,096, compared to 15,702 in Jackson.
- Residents in Jackson have a higher median age of 35.0 years compared to 34.6 years in Augusta.
- Jackson has a higher median income of $72,500 compared to $50,492 in Augusta.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jackson at 44.0% compared to 25.0% in Augusta.
- The poverty level is higher in Augusta at 18%, compared to 8% in Jackson.
- Augusta has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Jackson.
Demographics
Demographics Jackson vs Augusta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Jackson | Augusta |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 56 |
White | 89 | 31 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jackson vs Augusta
- In Augusta, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 2% in Jackson.
- Jackson has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 31% in Augusta.
- In Augusta, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Jackson.
- Augusta has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Jackson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Augusta at 6%, compared to 5% in Jackson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jackson and Augusta at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Jackson | Augusta |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 14.0% |
Depression | 25.5% | 21.6% |
Smoking | 17.9% | 20.6% |
Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 14.7% |
Obesity | 36.2% | 40.3% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jackson vs Augusta
- In Augusta, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.9% in Jackson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jackson at 25.5% compared to 21.6% in Augusta.
- Augusta has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 17.9% in Jackson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jackson at 19.1% compared to 14.7% in Augusta.
- Augusta has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 36.2% in Jackson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Augusta at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Jackson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Jackson | Augusta |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (72) | 0.8% (1,539) |
High School Diploma | 15.4% (2,423) | 17.1% (34,505) |
Less than High School | 7.8% (1,231) | 10.8% (21,758) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (3,742) | 15.6% (31,482) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jackson vs Augusta
- In Augusta, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Jackson.
- In Augusta, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 15.4% in Jackson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Augusta at 10.8%, compared to 7.8% in Jackson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jackson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 15.6% in Augusta.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.