Demographics details for Jackson, MO vs Apalachicola, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jackson, MO vs Apalachicola, FL.
Data | Jackson | Apalachicola |
---|---|---|
Population | 15,702 | 2,395 |
Median Age | 35.0 years | 53.8 years |
Median Income | $72,500 | $61,322 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Jackson vs Apalachicola
- In Jackson, the population is higher at 15,702, compared to 2,395 in Apalachicola.
- The median age in Apalachicola is higher at 53.8 years, compared to 35.0 years in Jackson.
- Jackson has a higher median income of $72,500 compared to $61,322 in Apalachicola.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jackson at 44.0% compared to 35.0% in Apalachicola.
- The poverty level is higher in Apalachicola at 18%, compared to 8% in Jackson.
- Apalachicola has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Jackson.
Demographics
Demographics Jackson vs Apalachicola provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Jackson | Apalachicola |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 27 |
White | 89 | 65 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jackson vs Apalachicola
- In Apalachicola, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 27% compared to 2% in Jackson.
- Jackson has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 65% in Apalachicola.
- Both Jackson and Apalachicola have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jackson at 3% compared to 2% in Apalachicola.
- Both Jackson and Apalachicola have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jackson and Apalachicola at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Jackson | Apalachicola |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 17.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 12.1% |
Depression | 25.5% | 19.8% |
Smoking | 17.9% | 20.1% |
Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 15.3% |
Obesity | 36.2% | 37.8% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jackson vs Apalachicola
- In Apalachicola, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.9% in Jackson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jackson at 25.5% compared to 19.8% in Apalachicola.
- Apalachicola has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 17.9% in Jackson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jackson at 19.1% compared to 15.3% in Apalachicola.
- Apalachicola has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 36.2% in Jackson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Apalachicola at 30.0% compared to 13.0% in Jackson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Jackson | Apalachicola |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (72) | 1.0% (25) |
High School Diploma | 15.4% (2,423) | 19.2% (461) |
Less than High School | 7.8% (1,231) | 29.5% (707) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (3,742) | 26.2% (627) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jackson vs Apalachicola
- In Apalachicola, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.5% in Jackson.
- In Apalachicola, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.2% compared to 15.4% in Jackson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Apalachicola at 29.5%, compared to 7.8% in Jackson.
- In Apalachicola, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 23.8% in Jackson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.