Demographics details for Jackson, MI vs Taylorsville, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jackson, MI vs Taylorsville, UT.
| Data | Jackson | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,031 | 57,879 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $41,988 | $81,417 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.9 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Jackson vs Taylorsville
- The population in Taylorsville is higher at 57,879, compared to 31,031 in Jackson.
- Residents in Jackson have a higher median age of 35.0 years compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher median income of $81,417, compared to $41,988 in Jackson.
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 27.0% in Jackson.
- Jackson has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
- The unemployment rate in Jackson is higher at 7.9%, compared to 3.6% in Taylorsville.
Demographics
Demographics Jackson vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jackson | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 21 | 1 |
| White | 62 | 57 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Jackson vs Taylorsville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jackson at 21% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
- Jackson has a higher percentage of White residents at 62% compared to 57% in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Jackson.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 6% in Jackson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jackson at 10% compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Jackson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jackson | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 27.0% | 27.2% |
| Smoking | 26.4% | 10.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 41.0% | 32.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jackson vs Taylorsville
- More residents in Jackson report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 18.8% in Taylorsville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Taylorsville at 27.2% versus 27.0% in Jackson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jackson at 26.4% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Taylorsville at 15.2% compared to 14.9% in Jackson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jackson at 41.0% compared to 32.0% in Taylorsville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jackson at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Taylorsville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jackson | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (166) | 1.2% (721) |
| High School Diploma | 21.1% (6,548) | 16.9% (9,799) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (4,397) | 15.2% (8,775) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (3,126) | 15.7% (9,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jackson vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Jackson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jackson hold a high school diploma at 21.1% compared to 16.9% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Taylorsville at 15.2%, compared to 14.2% in Jackson.
- In Taylorsville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 10.1% in Jackson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.