Demographics details for Jackson, MI vs Gladewater, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jackson, MI vs Gladewater, TX.
| Data | Jackson | Gladewater |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,031 | 6,230 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 33.3 years |
| Median Income | $41,988 | $47,749 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Jackson vs Gladewater
- In Jackson, the population is higher at 31,031, compared to 6,230 in Gladewater.
- Residents in Jackson have a higher median age of 35.0 years compared to 33.3 years in Gladewater.
- Gladewater has a higher median income of $47,749, compared to $41,988 in Jackson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jackson at 27.0% compared to 26.0% in Gladewater.
- Jackson has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 10% in Gladewater.
- The unemployment rate in Jackson is higher at 7.9%, compared to 3.2% in Gladewater.
Demographics
Demographics Jackson vs Gladewater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jackson | Gladewater |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 21 | 17 |
| White | 62 | 61 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jackson vs Gladewater
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jackson at 21% compared to 17% in Gladewater.
- Jackson has a higher percentage of White residents at 62% compared to 61% in Gladewater.
- Both Jackson and Gladewater have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Gladewater has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 6% in Jackson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jackson at 10% compared to 6% in Gladewater.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jackson and Gladewater at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jackson | Gladewater |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 27.0% | 25.8% |
| Smoking | 26.4% | 20.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 41.0% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jackson vs Gladewater
- More residents in Jackson report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 19.6% in Gladewater.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jackson at 27.0% compared to 25.8% in Gladewater.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jackson at 26.4% compared to 20.9% in Gladewater.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gladewater at 17.5% compared to 14.9% in Jackson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jackson at 41.0% compared to 38.5% in Gladewater.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gladewater at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Jackson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jackson | Gladewater |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (166) | 0.5% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 21.1% (6,548) | 18.2% (1,135) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (4,397) | 24.6% (1,532) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (3,126) | 7.6% (474) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jackson vs Gladewater
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Jackson and Gladewater at 0.5%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jackson hold a high school diploma at 21.1% compared to 18.2% in Gladewater.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gladewater at 24.6%, compared to 14.2% in Jackson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jackson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.1% compared to 7.6% in Gladewater.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.